2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse woody debris and the carbon balance of a north temperate forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
113
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
21
113
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to these, very different values are presented in the literature for the carbon stock of FWD [14,43]. Similar to the results in our study, Gough et al [44] provided a carbon stock value of total woody debris of 2.2 Mg·C·ha −1 in temperate forest, emphasizing that this value is an important carbon stock and close to the living leaf biomass carbon stock (1.8 Mg·C·ha −1 ). However, in our study, carbon stocks in leaf biomass were calculated as 1.54-3.67 Mg·C·ha −1 , which is higher than FWD carbon stocks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition to these, very different values are presented in the literature for the carbon stock of FWD [14,43]. Similar to the results in our study, Gough et al [44] provided a carbon stock value of total woody debris of 2.2 Mg·C·ha −1 in temperate forest, emphasizing that this value is an important carbon stock and close to the living leaf biomass carbon stock (1.8 Mg·C·ha −1 ). However, in our study, carbon stocks in leaf biomass were calculated as 1.54-3.67 Mg·C·ha −1 , which is higher than FWD carbon stocks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The models were spun up, i.e., brought to a steady state with a mature forest, and then the entire site was clear-cut, with all trees removed, i.e., harvested and the biomass taken away. This approximates the known stand-replacing disturbances of the early 20th century (Gough et al, 2007) in the UMBS forest. The models then allowed the forest to recover over 90 years before imposing 13-14 % harvests of basal area (ED and ZELIG) and biomass (Biome-BGC) in 2008, 2009, and 2010.…”
Section: Modeling Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…NEP in the unmanipulated footprint of the UMBS control tower (US-UMBS) was 0.80-1.98 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 from 1999 to 2006, averaging 1.58 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 with substantial landscape variation (Gough et al, 2009). The forest was heavily logged in the late 1800s and early 1900s and disturbed by fire until 1923; its present-day plant composition is typical of many forests in the upper Great Lakes region (Gough et al, 2007).…”
Section: Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, thinning reduces C storage by lowering standing wood volume, as well as the amount of live wood transferred to detrital pools and eventually the soil, and may increase rates of heterotrophic respiration (Gough et al 2007, Harmon et al 2009, Stoffel et al 2010, Forrester et al 2012). This C stored as down wood can also provide a substrate for the establishment of plants, and increases resource and environmental heterogeneity in the understory (Harmon et al 1994, Harmon and Sexton 1995, Campbell and Gower 2000, Spears et al 2003, Devine and Harrington 2007, Kluber et al 2009, Weaver et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%