2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07432-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse-to-fine spatial-channel-boundary attention network for image copy-move forgery detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gamma function is employed to convert the integral of integer order (G-L) to fractional order The fractional differential of ∝ -order is denoted in Eq. (13).…”
Section: Fractional Derivativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gamma function is employed to convert the integral of integer order (G-L) to fractional order The fractional differential of ∝ -order is denoted in Eq. (13).…”
Section: Fractional Derivativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a strong image forensics tool for detecting and localizing copied movement is required [12]. Because of the uniform characteristics region of the source and target, image copy-move forgery technology produces a good visual effect and a believable fake result with basic manipulations such as noise addition, JPEG compression, scaling, rotating, and blurring [13,14]. Therefore, forged image identification is explored to provide efficient solutions utilizing deep learning algorithms [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network used the DenseNet 41 model to extract deep features, which were classified using the Mask-RCNN [47] to locate tampered regions. Zhong et al [48] proposed a coarse-fine spatial channel boundary attention network and designed the attention module for boundary refinement to obtain finer forgery details and improve the performance of detection. In a few papers [38][39][40][43][44][45], the authors improved the detection performance and robustness of the algorithm but did not distinguish between source and target areas.…”
Section: Image Copy-move Forgery Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attentional Cross-domain CNN Features Splicing DenseNet Zhong [42] Nazir [44] Zhong [46] Dense Link and Feature Reuse…”
Section: Multi-scale Features Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network used the DenseNet 41 model to extract deep features, which were classified using the Mask-RCNN [45] to locate tampered regions. Zhong et al [46] proposed a coarse-fine spatial channel boundary attention network and designed the attention module for boundary refinement to obtain finer forgery details and improve the performance of detection. In [36][37][38][41][42][43], they improve the detection performance and robustness of the algorithm, but do not distinguish between source and target areas.…”
Section: Image Copy-move Forgery Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%