The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse Correlation in Extensive-Form Games

Abstract: Coarse correlation models strategic interactions of rational agents complemented by a correlation device which is a mediator that can recommend behavior but not enforce it. Despite being a classical concept in the theory of normal-form games since 1978, not much is known about the merits of coarse correlation in extensive-form settings. In this paper, we consider two instantiations of the idea of coarse correlation in extensive-form games: normal-form coarse-correlated equilibrium (NFCCE), already defined in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as pointed out by Celli et al [16], the study of algorithms for team games could shed further light on how to deal with imperfect-recall games, which are receiving increasing attention in the community due to the application of imperfect-recall abstractions to the computation of strategies for large sequential games. As for the computation of correlated equilibria in sequential games, it would be interesting to further investigate whether it is possible to define regret-minimizing procedures for general EFGs leading to refinements of the CCEs, such as EFCCEs [22]. A recent work studying a related problem is Celli et al [15].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as pointed out by Celli et al [16], the study of algorithms for team games could shed further light on how to deal with imperfect-recall games, which are receiving increasing attention in the community due to the application of imperfect-recall abstractions to the computation of strategies for large sequential games. As for the computation of correlated equilibria in sequential games, it would be interesting to further investigate whether it is possible to define regret-minimizing procedures for general EFGs leading to refinements of the CCEs, such as EFCCEs [22]. A recent work studying a related problem is Celli et al [15].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, as long as we have a "nice" DGF for scaled extensions and a "nice" DGF for the polytope Y, we can apply fast FOMs to the computation of the corresponding type of correlated equilibrium. Appropriate polytopes for Y exist in the case of EFCE [16], EFCCE [10], and NFCCE [10]. In each case, Y is itself a polytope that can be constructed via scaled extension (though simpler than Ξ).…”
Section: Preliminaries On Correlation and Triangle-freenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting (10) into the last inequality yields a proof of the desired strong convexity modulus 1/𝑀 𝑄 . □…”
Section: A Proofs Missing From the Main Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we introduce an equivalent characterization of EFCEs (Farina, Bianchi, and Sandholm 2020). It is based on the following concept of trigger agent, originally due to Gordon, Greenwald, and Marks (2008).…”
Section: Correlation In Extensive-form Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide a formal statement of the characterization of EFCEs based on trigger agents (see Definition 4), originally introduced by Gordon, Greenwald, and Marks (2008) and Farina et al (2019a) (see also (Farina, Bianchi, and Sandholm 2020) for a more general treatment). We recall that such characterization is based on the fact that µ ∈ ∆ Π is an EFCE if, for every i ∈ N , player i's expected utility when following recommendations is at least as large as the expected utility that any (I, a, μi )-trigger agent for player i can achieve (assuming the opponents' do not deviate from recommendations).…”
Section: B Characterization Of Efces Using Trigger Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%