Handbook of Statistical Genetics 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470061619.ch25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalescent Theory

Abstract: The coalescent process is a powerful modeling tool for population genetics. The allelic states of all homologous gene copies in a population are determined by the genealogical and mutational history of these copies. The coalescent approach is based on the realization that the genealogy is usually easier to model backward in time, and that selectively neutral mutations can then be superimposed afterwards. A wide range of biological phenomena can be modeled using this approach.Whereas almost all of classical pop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stochastic process known as the coalescent was first introduced by Kingman (1982), while Hudson (1983) and Tajima (1983) also independently described this process in biological journals with discussions on the statistical issues involved in the analysis of polymorphism data. Since then, a number of population geneticists have contributed to further development of the coalescent theory (reviewed by Tavaré (1984), Hudson (1990), Fu and Li (1999), Nordborg (2001), Hein et al (2005)). …”
Section: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms In Duplicated Genesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The stochastic process known as the coalescent was first introduced by Kingman (1982), while Hudson (1983) and Tajima (1983) also independently described this process in biological journals with discussions on the statistical issues involved in the analysis of polymorphism data. Since then, a number of population geneticists have contributed to further development of the coalescent theory (reviewed by Tavaré (1984), Hudson (1990), Fu and Li (1999), Nordborg (2001), Hein et al (2005)). …”
Section: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms In Duplicated Genesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After the regression, the adjusted values were backtransformed taking their exponential so that posterior densities were expressed in the original scale. The simulated data was obtained using a standard coalescent process (Hudson 1990;Nordborg 2001). We used the stepwise mutation model (Kimura and Ohta 1978) for the microsatellite data and an infinite sites model (Kimura 1969) for sequence data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven individuals of C. melanosterna, three C. palearis, 13 C. bakeri, three C. oedirhina, and one C. similis (outgroup) were included. For nuclear markers, diploid individuals do not correspond to the tips of a gene tree because each individual contains two alleles that may or may not be identical by state and formally cannot be identical by descent from the previous generation (Nordborg 2001). Construction of a concatenated file such as that required by BEST is equivalent to randomly sampling one allele per individual.…”
Section: Bayesian Estimation Of Species Trees (Best) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%