2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalescences of microdroplets at a cross-shaped microchannel junction without strictly synchronism control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the microdroplets for merging should arrive at the T-shaped junction at the same time, and the contact time of microdroplets is very short. However, due to the two-phase flow characteristics in microchannel and other uncontrollable factors of microdroplets transportation, etc., the synchronism of microdroplets is hard to maintain in the actual operating process, especially for the head-on collision of microdroplets at a T-shaped junction (Wang et al 2013a). Therefore, T-shaped junction cannot ensure efficient merging of microdroplets and adding a rectangular microgroove can avoid the synchronism problem and increase the chance of microdroplets merging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Usually, the microdroplets for merging should arrive at the T-shaped junction at the same time, and the contact time of microdroplets is very short. However, due to the two-phase flow characteristics in microchannel and other uncontrollable factors of microdroplets transportation, etc., the synchronism of microdroplets is hard to maintain in the actual operating process, especially for the head-on collision of microdroplets at a T-shaped junction (Wang et al 2013a). Therefore, T-shaped junction cannot ensure efficient merging of microdroplets and adding a rectangular microgroove can avoid the synchronism problem and increase the chance of microdroplets merging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been developed to achieve droplet merging and splitting, which can be generally categorized as active (Zagnoni et al 2009; Wang et al 2009; Jung et al 2015; Xu et al 2012; Sesen et al 2014) and passive (Wang et al 2013a; Simon and Lee 2012; Niu et al 2008) methods. Passive methods are generally flow-induced and based on geometry-mediated mechanisms (Christopher et al 2009; Zhou et al 2015; Wang et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations