2018
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalescence and self‐bunching observed in commercial high‐resolution mass spectrometry instrumentation

Abstract: The conventional measurement of a peak width does not truly reflect the mass resolving power of modern HRMS instrumentation. The mass resolving power is better demonstrated by resolving a mixture of isobaric compounds. Measurements obtained at low and high ion abundances should be investigated. Coalescence and self-bunching can reduce the truly available mass resolving power and therefore negatively affect quantitative and qualitative measurements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of background ion signal plays a central role in determining the sensitivity of LC-MS analyses, in particular for screening assays, by negatively impacting the overall analytical performance due to the finite intra-scan dynamic range and possible coalescence and self-bunching effects (Kaufmann and Walker, 2017, 2018). In the context of our methodology, an Orbitrap detector has a finite ion capacity and therefore the length of time (ion injection time) ions are collected for analysis is tightly regulated by setting a target ion number (automated gain control setting).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of background ion signal plays a central role in determining the sensitivity of LC-MS analyses, in particular for screening assays, by negatively impacting the overall analytical performance due to the finite intra-scan dynamic range and possible coalescence and self-bunching effects (Kaufmann and Walker, 2017, 2018). In the context of our methodology, an Orbitrap detector has a finite ion capacity and therefore the length of time (ion injection time) ions are collected for analysis is tightly regulated by setting a target ion number (automated gain control setting).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, when mixture VI , analyzed with direct MS 2 , is processed, only 4 of 6 molecular formulae and 2 of 6 structures are correct. The wrong assignment of the molecular formulae arises from a combination of two adverse effects in high‐resolution tandem MS: (1) partial ion coalescence 45 , 46 , 47 leads to significant shifts in accurate mass of the precursor (Figure S13 , supporting information) and (2) the many fragments from other precursors possibly coincided with a fragment which would be consistent with the erroneous precursor mass. Here, IQAROS can help by eliminating fragments which coincidently fit a reasonable mass difference but actually stem from an interfering precursor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thus obtained wrong “accurate” mass is in many cases the ion‐abundance weighted average of the two correct “accurate” (exact) masses. In addition, there is the phenomenon of coalescence where two isobaric ion populations behave like a single ion population and the resulting mass peak appears as a perfect symmetrical shape. The sequential isolation of mass ranges (SWATH windows) reduces the density (complexity) of the product ion spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%