2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2005.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coal reverse flotation. Part II: Cleaning of a subbituminous coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7(a)). In the second part of their work, Ding and Laskowski (2006b) found that at the same dosage the reject ash was more than 80% at reject yield between 35 and 40% ( Fig. 7(b)).…”
Section: Mode Of Depressant Actionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7(a)). In the second part of their work, Ding and Laskowski (2006b) found that at the same dosage the reject ash was more than 80% at reject yield between 35 and 40% ( Fig. 7(b)).…”
Section: Mode Of Depressant Actionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As stated above reverse coal flotation process has been tried for both sub-bituminous, lignite as well as oxidised coals (Pawlik and Laskowski, 2003b;Pawlik, 2002;Melo, 2005;Ding and Laskowski, 2006b;Patil and Laskowski, 2008;Vamvuka and Agridiotis, 2001;Zhang et al, 2013;Ozturk and Temel, 2013;) and satisfactory results have been found on the feasibility of the process for such coals. The main reason behind this can be attributed to the lesser hydrophobic nature of these coals which occur naturally.…”
Section: Effect Of Coal Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations