2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coagulopathy in Cirrhosis: A Prospective Study to Correlate Conventional Tests of Coagulation and Bleeding Following Invasive Procedures in Cirrhotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, Indian patients with cirrhosis (n=380) were assessed prospectively according to the presence or absence of abnormal coagulation parameters (defined as INR ≥1.5 and/or platelet count ≤50 000/μL). These deranged conventional coagulation parameters did not predict clinically significant bleeding in cirrhosis and both high‐ and low‐risk invasive procedures were carried out safely …”
Section: Risk Of Thrombocytopenia With Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, Indian patients with cirrhosis (n=380) were assessed prospectively according to the presence or absence of abnormal coagulation parameters (defined as INR ≥1.5 and/or platelet count ≤50 000/μL). These deranged conventional coagulation parameters did not predict clinically significant bleeding in cirrhosis and both high‐ and low‐risk invasive procedures were carried out safely …”
Section: Risk Of Thrombocytopenia With Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These deranged conventional coagulation parameters did not predict clinically significant bleeding in cirrhosis and both high-and low-risk invasive procedures were carried out safely. 16 Therapeutic procedures (but not diagnostic procedures with lower gauge needles) in cirrhotic patients may lead to mild bleeding complications, which are dependent upon the characteristics of the patient (e.g. higher risk with platelet count [≤50 000/μL], Child-Pugh stage C and alcoholic cirrhosis) and of the procedure itself.…”
Section: Invasive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of bleeding risk in CH is challenging because of the liver's complex and antagonistic role in the synthesis and degradation of pro‐ and anti‐thrombotic proteins and its role in fibrinolysis . Assessment by evaluation of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, or buccal mucosal bleeding time (BMBT) does not consistently predict risk of bleeding after liver biopsy in humans . In humans, there is consensus that moderate to severe prolongations in PT and aPTT (>1.5 × upper limit of normal), platelet count <50 000/μL, anemia (PCV < 30%), and low plasma fibrinogen concentration (<100 mg/dL) have some predictive ability in assessing bleeding risk and thus these variables have been incorporated into pre‐procedural standard of care guidelines …”
Section: Biopsy Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…214,[230][231][232][233] Assessment by evaluation of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, or buccal mucosal bleeding time (BMBT) does not consistently predict risk of bleeding after liver biopsy in humans. [234][235][236][237] In humans, there is consensus that moderate to severe prolongations in PT and aPTT (>1.5 × upper limit of normal), platelet count <50 000/μL, anemia (PCV < 30%), and low plasma fibrinogen concentration (<100 mg/dL) have some predictive ability in assessing bleeding risk and thus these variables have been incorporated into pre-procedural standard of care guidelines. [237][238][239][240] Coagulation and hematological abnormalities may exist in dogs with CH.…”
Section: Pre-biopsy Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever indicated, any invasive procedures could be safely carried out in patients with cirrhosis without past correction of abnormal routine coagulation tests. (3) In the preliminary data of an ongoing prospective study of 60 patients with cirrhosis who underwent invasive procedures, we compared TEG with conventional coagulation tests in all patients; none of the patients in the study received prophylactic correction of abnormal conventional coagulation tests before the invasive procedure or surgery. We found that only 1 patient developed postprocedural clinically significant bleeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%