2017
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.014963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coagulation Testing in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Taking Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants

Abstract: Background and Purpose-In patients who present with acute ischemic stroke while on treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), coagulation testing is necessary to confirm the eligibility for thrombolytic therapy. We evaluated the current use of coagulation testing in routine clinical practice in patients who were on NOAC treatment at the time of acute ischemic stroke. Methods-Prospective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the current study was not to show whether IVT or EVT in patients on NOAC is safe and effective but using drugspecific plasma levels for patients’ selection is feasible. This approach offers the advantage to base the selection on drug specific plasma levels rather than on non-specific coagulation tests prone to underestimate the anticoagulant effect of NOAC [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of the current study was not to show whether IVT or EVT in patients on NOAC is safe and effective but using drugspecific plasma levels for patients’ selection is feasible. This approach offers the advantage to base the selection on drug specific plasma levels rather than on non-specific coagulation tests prone to underestimate the anticoagulant effect of NOAC [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, no point-of-care (POC) device exists to reliably measure RivLev. Although, POC to measure INR has been used in patients on NOAC [ 36 ] and approaches using the INR to guide the decision for IVT in patients on rivaroxaban have been proposed [ 34 ], the correlation between INR and RivLev in patients with acute ischemic stroke is currently unclear and risk of false-negative results has been reported [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 Because NOAC plasma concentrations on admission or measurements of calibrated anti-Xa activity were not available in our stroke cohort, coagulation tests on hospital admission were analysed (as similarly reported in a German registry). 24 Despite uncertain sensitivity and specificity, these tests provide useful information to assess a residual anticoagulant effect of NOACs—in patients with abnormal results—indicating a recent intake. 25 Of note, NOAC patients with elevated routine coagulation tests had a significantly lower probability of severe stroke when compared to patients without antithrombotic medication on admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, we were unable to assess the adherence to NOAC intake and the actual anticoagulatory effect at the time of stroke onset in more detail because specific tests like calibrated anti-Xa activity are not part of clinical routine so far. 24 We addressed this issue by comparing NOAC patients with and without altered routine coagulation tests to those patients without medical stroke prevention. Fifth, due to retrospective data assessment we were unable to assess the impact of pre-hospital time in therapeutic range (TTR) on stroke severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of stroke ranges from 1% to 2% in the subset of AF under anticoagulation therapy. Both assessment of adherence to NOAC therapy and measurement of anticoagulant plasma level on admission remains crucial to optimize the secondary prevention strategy [107].…”
Section: Patients Presenting With Acute Stroke: Use Of Endovascular Tmentioning
confidence: 99%