2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(11)60866-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coagulation efficiency and flocs characteristics of recycling sludge during treatment of low temperature and micro-polluted water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2-4 of water samples produced by the recycling process were not obviously increased, which forcefully indicated that the recycling process could be used as an alternative method to treat low turbidity water, saving water resources. In addition, Zhou et al (2012) stated that the removal of organic substances by hydrolyzed metal coagulants is likely to cause a neutralizing effect. The anionic sites over the surface of organic materials could be bound by metal species like Al 3+ and Fe 3+ present in the PFAC, and then particles formed by this means can be removed during the subsequent sedimentation or filtration units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2-4 of water samples produced by the recycling process were not obviously increased, which forcefully indicated that the recycling process could be used as an alternative method to treat low turbidity water, saving water resources. In addition, Zhou et al (2012) stated that the removal of organic substances by hydrolyzed metal coagulants is likely to cause a neutralizing effect. The anionic sites over the surface of organic materials could be bound by metal species like Al 3+ and Fe 3+ present in the PFAC, and then particles formed by this means can be removed during the subsequent sedimentation or filtration units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gottfried et al (Gottfried et al, 2008) stated that the addition of reused backwash water solids was beneficial in increasing the collision and adhesion probabilities of suspended particles to further enhance the traditional treatment technology, and notably higher removal efficiency for DOC and UV 254 was found, when the raw water blended with 5% and 10% by volume of filter backwash water was re-input into the conventional drinking water treatment. Xu et al (2009) and Zhou et al (2012) thought that the remaining amorphous aluminum and ferric hydroxide in the waste sludge probably did not fully react during the traditional process, and thus could be used as aggregated cores in the recycling process, enhancing the collision probabilities among particles. According to other studies, the removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts could be enhanced by 4.3%-20% when untreated filter backwash water was recycled to the input of the coagulation process (Cornwell and Lee, 1994;Cornwell et al, 1987;Cristale et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of sludge recycling instead of directly discharging could take full advantage of the sludge for improving the performance of drinking water treatment [10]. Sludge recycling is a practice known in the wastewater treatment field, since sludge has been proven to be capable of purifying water [11]. The main advantages of the sludge recycling approach are as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical safety and bio-stability are the two main concerns of reuse process [3], thus limiting the concentration of organic matter and metal ions, and controlling microbial activity to a low level within sludge before recycling can help ensure the safety of the recycle outputs. The reuse of DWTS can contribute toward an improvement of treatment performance regarding the particulates and phosphorus removal [3,4], and an improvement in settling and dewatering characteristics of the re-coagulation flocs as well. However, the enhanced removal of pollutions, i.e., organic matter of recycling processes sometimes is not desirable due to the release of pollutions (humic-like and protein-like substances) that are derived from sludge [2,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%