The SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 2012
DOI: 10.4135/9781446247549.n19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaching in the K-12 Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an effort to avoid these obstacles, key coaching competencies have been established and are currently promoted across several disciplines, including education (Ennis et al, 2005). For example, Killion (2012) defined the coach role through 10 pivotal competencies, including: (a) resource provider, (b) data coach, (c) curriculum specialist, (d) instructional specialist, (e) mentor, (f) classroom supporter, (g) learning facilitator, (h) school leader, (i) catalyst for change, and (j) learner. Such guidelines can be helpful with supporting professional development opportunities for educators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to avoid these obstacles, key coaching competencies have been established and are currently promoted across several disciplines, including education (Ennis et al, 2005). For example, Killion (2012) defined the coach role through 10 pivotal competencies, including: (a) resource provider, (b) data coach, (c) curriculum specialist, (d) instructional specialist, (e) mentor, (f) classroom supporter, (g) learning facilitator, (h) school leader, (i) catalyst for change, and (j) learner. Such guidelines can be helpful with supporting professional development opportunities for educators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research supports this assertion, producing evidence that instructional coaching can contribute to substantive change in teaching and improvement in student learning outcomes (cf., a meta-analysis on coaching by Kraft et al [2018] and Campbell and Malkus’s [2011] experimental study). Some quasi-experimental and observational studies provide further promising evidence that coaching programs, when well designed, can be a promising intervention worthy of scale (Foster & Noyce, 2004; Garet et al, 2011; Killion, 2012; Mangin & Dunsmore, 2014; Neufeld & Roper, 2003; Polly, 2012). However, the research on coaching also shows that effects on teaching and student learning are variable.…”
Section: Literature Review and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an emerging evidence base to suggest that instructional coaching is a promising intervention to support teaching improvement and student learning (Allen, Pianta, Gregory, Mikami, & Lun, 2011; Biancarosa, Bryk, & Dexter, 2010; Blazar & Kraft, 2015; Bryk, Gomez, Grunow, & LeMahieu, 2015; Campbell & Malkus, 2011; Foster & Noyce, 2004; Garet et al, 2011; Killion, 2012; Mangin & Dunsmore, 2015; Matsumura, Garnier, & Resnick, 2010; Matsumura, Garnier, & Spybrook, 2012, 2013; Neufeld & Roper, 2003; Neuman & Cunningham, 2009; Polly, 2012; Powell, Diamond, Burchinal, & Koehler, 2010; Sailors & Price, 2010). For example, a 3-year randomized control study conducted by Campbell and Malkus (2011) found that coaches positively influenced elementary student mathematics achievement, particularly after coaches had gained experience and skill through extensive professional development.…”
Section: Conceptual Groundingmentioning
confidence: 99%