Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey

Abstract

Objective We surveyed coaches’ views on topics related to the training process to elucidate whether their opinions are aligned with the current literature. Here the results for a sub-set of questions regarding factors affecting the training adaptation process are presented and discussed. Methods 106 coaches [age range 18–65 + years, 31% 15 + years coaching, 58% individual-events/sports and 32% international level] from a number of countries completed a novel cross-sectional online survey about the planning of training and the training process. Results Only 28% of participants indicated that physical training was the most important factor in determining sport performance; whereas 99% indicated non-physical factors influence physical training response. The top five factors in modifying an athlete’s ability to physically adapt to a training plan, as rated ‘absolutely essential’, were ‘coach-athlete relationship’ (56%), ‘life stress’ (41%), ‘athletes’ belief in the plan’ (37%), ‘psychological and emotional stress’ (35%) and ‘physical training’ (33%). Conclusions Amongst coaches surveyed less than a third rated physical training as the most important factor in determining sports performance. Non-physical factors were acknowledged by the majority to exert an influence on physical training response and adaptation, despite the lack of discussion in training research, though there was no consensus on the relative importance of each individual factor. We echo previous sentiments that coaches need to be engaged in the research process. If training research continues as present the field runs the risk of not only becoming detached but increasingly irrelevant to those it is trying to help.

A Scoping Review on the Influence of Contextual Factors on Training Load in Adolescent Soccer Players: What Do We Know?

“…Nevertheless, research shows that psychosocial stress could originate from players' sporting and non-sporting context (e.g., education, match performance, family life) and has the potential to moderate TL [6,7,11]. This is in line with a recent study where coaches expressed the importance of four non-physical factors (coach-athlete relationship, life stress, athletes' belief in the plan, and psychological and emotional stress) as integral for an athlete to physically adapt to a training plan [50]. Moreover, a severe negative life event impaired the running economy for sustained periods in runners [19].…”

Deloading Practices in Strength and Physique Sports: A Cross-Sectional Survey

“…Along with the recognition that lifestyle, phenotype, and psychosocial factors external to training can affect individuals' recovery and adaptive potential [22], this variability underpins autoregulated training [25]. Indeed, recent data highlights that coaches perceive that factors outside of physical training can heavily in uence an athlete's adaptive response to that training, including life, psychological and emotional stresses [29]. This means that life-related factors outside of pre-programmed training might in uence an individual's ability to adapt to it appropriately.…”

“…To explain, resistance training acts as an acute stressor that leads to physiological responses within the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system that antedate psychological stress [36]. It has been argued that training in general should be viewed as a biopsychosocial process with complex physical and psychological interactions [37] and recall that recent insight from coaches highlights that stress responses are perceived to markedly affect athletes' response to training [29]. Allostatic load is the cumulative effect of chronic exposure to the perceived environmental and physical stressors [39], and while exposure to stress is an important antecedent to adaptation [39], repeated stress without su cient recovery is harmful [40].…”

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with the application of artificial intelligence in connection with sport research, coaching, and optimization of athletic performance: a brief SWOT analysis

“…The performance of repetitive and time-consuming tasks by AI could free up more time for personal activities that improve the relationship between a coach and his athletes, which is often regarded as a key factor in the effectiveness of training ( 27 ).…”