Coaches and Clients in Action: A Sequential Analysis of Interpersonal Coach and Client Behavior

Abstract

Purpose Despite calls for studying interaction processes in coaching, little is known about the link between coachclient interactions and coaching success. In particular, interpersonal behavior in coaching remains unexplored, although it is considered highly relevant to social relationships and interaction outcomes. This study takes first steps to address this gap. Design/Methodology/Approach We examined the dynamics of coaches' and clients' interpersonal behavior based on the two basic dimensions affiliation and dominance. Furthermore, we investigated the link between emergent interpersonal behavior patterns and coaching outcomes. To this end, we videotaped and analyzed a total of 11,095 behavioral acts nested in 30 coach-client dyads. Findings Sequential analysis showed that reciprocal friendliness patterns were positively linked to working alliance. Coaches' dominant-friendly interaction behavior particularly activated clients, in terms of showing dominance during the coaching interaction process. Clients' dominance was linked to their overall goal attainment. ImplicationsOur results highlight the importance of interpersonal behavior for coaching success. Specifically, our findings suggest that dominance interaction patterns are context-and relation-specific, offering an explanation for contradicting empirical studies on interpersonal dominance. For coaches, our study implies that high awareness for interpersonal signals can help establish a positive atmosphere and activate clients' dominance. Originality/Value This empirical study uses behavior observation and interaction analysis to understand the interpersonal dynamics during coaching sessions. Our results increase our theoretical understanding of coaching effectiveness by shedding light on the micro-level behavioral dynamics that drive successful coaching processes.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Individual Coaching, Self-Coaching, and Group Training: How Leadership Makes the Difference

“…Goal attainment was assessed on a process evaluation scale (Braumandl and Dirscherl, 2005; Ianiro et al, 2014; Biberacher, 2010, Unpublished), ranging from 1 ( not at all achieved ) to 10 ( fully achieved ). Participants rated their degree of actual goal attainment (“As of right now, to what extent have you attained this goal?”) for up to three goals.…”

Relationship between Nonverbal Behavior of Consultants and Consultees: A Preliminary Study

“…The behaviors of the consultants in the two consultation sessions with the consultee (one session per client) were averaged and examined for their influence on the consultee. Ianiro et al (2015) showed that lag sequential analysis can be used to examine interdependencies between behaviors and interactions at the micro level over time. We used lag sequential analysis to examine how the nonverbal behavior of the consultant controls that of the consultee.…”

Value-forming micro-practices of managerial coaching

“…This research field is still to some extent underexplored, e.g., concerning the effects of coaching in terms of legitimacy and experiences on the employee level (Passmore & Fillery-Travis, 2011). Having said that, there are coaching studies focusing on the somewhat wider phenomenon, the coach-client relationship, such as the one reported on by De Haan (2008) and Ianiro, Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Kauffeld (2015). Qualities identified include other-awareness, understanding, and the attentiveness and responsiveness of the coach.…”