2023
DOI: 10.2196/41981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coach-Supported Versus Self-guided Digital Training Course for a Problem-solving Psychological Intervention for Nonspecialists: Protocol for a Pre-Post Nested Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Background Psychosocial interventions delivered by nonspecialists can be effective at reducing common adolescent mental health problems in low-resource settings. However, there is a lack of evidence on resource-efficient methods for building capacity to deliver these interventions. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a digital training (DT) course, delivered in a self-guided format or with coaching, on nonspecialists’ com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speci c feasibility indicators related to retention (number of participants who completed all three modules as a proportion of those who started the intervention); module participation (mean number of modules completed and mean number/duration of coaching sessions attended by those who started the intervention); time taken to complete the intervention; and coaching delity. Following a method used in other guided intervention studies with a facilitating "coach" (Mathur et al, 2023), delity was assessed by an independent rater who scored all recorded coaching sessions using a 3-point scale (0 = not completed, 1 = partially completed, 2 = fully completed) across six items: (1) engaging the participant and setting the agenda; (2) reviewing progress with module content; (3) answering queries about module content; (4) reviewing homework learning task; (5) planning the next module; and (6) concluding the session. Scores across the six components were summed for each module with a higher score indicating greater coaching delity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speci c feasibility indicators related to retention (number of participants who completed all three modules as a proportion of those who started the intervention); module participation (mean number of modules completed and mean number/duration of coaching sessions attended by those who started the intervention); time taken to complete the intervention; and coaching delity. Following a method used in other guided intervention studies with a facilitating "coach" (Mathur et al, 2023), delity was assessed by an independent rater who scored all recorded coaching sessions using a 3-point scale (0 = not completed, 1 = partially completed, 2 = fully completed) across six items: (1) engaging the participant and setting the agenda; (2) reviewing progress with module content; (3) answering queries about module content; (4) reviewing homework learning task; (5) planning the next module; and (6) concluding the session. Scores across the six components were summed for each module with a higher score indicating greater coaching delity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steps taken to translate the manual into a digital curriculum are described in the published study protocol paper (Mathur et al, 2023b). The course was available in two languages, English and Hindi, either of which could be selected by the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peers and supervisors also provided formative feedback on recordings and offered suggestions for future coaching sessions, as required. The development and content of the coaching protocol have been described in greater detail in the published study protocol (Mathur et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phase was embedded within a larger study that evaluated two digital formats (with and without coaching) for training NSPs in the PRIDE problem-solving intervention (Mathur et al, 2022). The participants were 277 NSPs recruited from four universities (located in Delhi, Bangalore and Mumbai) and five non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working in the fields of adolescent health and education.…”
Section: Participants and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%