2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co3O4 hollow microspheres on polypyrrole nanotubes network enabling long-term cyclability sulfur cathode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As exhibited in Figures a and S11–S13, S/CR-Por-PPIs@800 composites have better electrochemical performances (discharging capacity, cycling stability, and capacity decay retention) compared to S/CR-Por-H-PPI, which declares their outstanding electrochemical advantage of conductive carbon-based and metal-doping hosts. In contrast to S/CR-Por-H-PPI@800 composites, metal-doping CR-Por-Cu/Co/Zn-PPIs@800 have superior cycling stabilities (higher discharging capacity and lower capacity decay rate) (Figures e,g and c), and we summarize the reasons as follows: first, the introduction of metal substances reduces the kinetic energy barrier (the early responding peak time of Li 2 S nucleation and decreased activation energy barrier E a ); , second, the existence of metal substances is conducive to the improvement of the catalytic effect and increases the reaction kinetics (larger Li 2 S nucleation capacity); and third, the presence of metal substances enhances the adsorption ability toward LiPSs (larger Li 2 S 6 trapping capacity). The above factors eventually achieve the kinetic equilibrium during adsorption–diffusion–conversion.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As exhibited in Figures a and S11–S13, S/CR-Por-PPIs@800 composites have better electrochemical performances (discharging capacity, cycling stability, and capacity decay retention) compared to S/CR-Por-H-PPI, which declares their outstanding electrochemical advantage of conductive carbon-based and metal-doping hosts. In contrast to S/CR-Por-H-PPI@800 composites, metal-doping CR-Por-Cu/Co/Zn-PPIs@800 have superior cycling stabilities (higher discharging capacity and lower capacity decay rate) (Figures e,g and c), and we summarize the reasons as follows: first, the introduction of metal substances reduces the kinetic energy barrier (the early responding peak time of Li 2 S nucleation and decreased activation energy barrier E a ); , second, the existence of metal substances is conducive to the improvement of the catalytic effect and increases the reaction kinetics (larger Li 2 S nucleation capacity); and third, the presence of metal substances enhances the adsorption ability toward LiPSs (larger Li 2 S 6 trapping capacity). The above factors eventually achieve the kinetic equilibrium during adsorption–diffusion–conversion.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In comparison to COCNF, the single-component CNF and BCO catalyst is almost inactive for water oxidation and produced a negligible OER activity due to its rapid recombination of photoinduced electron−hole pairs and intrinsic low electronic conductivity. 39,40 As shown in Figure 3b, once CNF mechanically mixed with 5 wt % BCO, the obtained mixture of BCO and CNF (denoted as BCOCNF) showed a 1.6-and 24.6-fold OER rate increase in comparison to BCOPCN and CNF, respectively. Meanwhile, the turnover frequency (TOF) of COCNF reached 5.94 h −1 (Figure 3c), far higher than those of BCOCNF (1.06 h −1 ), BCOPCN (0.67 h −1 ), BCO (<0.1 h −1 ), and CNF (<0.1 h −1 ).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Less pronounced effects were reported for composites of TiO 2 in PEDOT (Liu et al 2020d). Microspheres of Co 3 O 4 embedded in PPy nanotubes served as hosts for sulfur in a lithium-sulfur battery (Wu et al 2020b). 0.034% capacitance loss per cycle were observed during 1900 cycles.…”
Section: Icps and Composites In Secondary Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 91%