2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 uptake and ecophysiological parameters of the grain crops of midcontinent North America: Estimates from flux tower measurements

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe analyzed net CO 2 exchange data from 13 flux tower sites with 27 site-years of measurements over maize and wheat fields across midcontinent North America. A numerically robust "light-soil temperature-VPD"-based method was used to partition the data into photosynthetic assimilation and ecosystem respiration components. Year-round ecosystem-scale ecophysiological parameters of apparent quantum yield, photosynthetic capacity, convexity of the light response, respiration rate parameters, ecologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
43
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(74 reference statements)
6
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used NEP at the 30 min time step from the flux towers to quality control for possible instrument related outliers. The quality controlled carbon flux data sets were partitioned into gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Re) components utilizing light response and vapor pressure-based partitioning of carbon flux into GPP and Re components [2][3][4]. Partitioning the fluxes into GPP and Re facilitated a more functional filling of temporary flux tower data gaps [24].…”
Section: Flux Tower Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We used NEP at the 30 min time step from the flux towers to quality control for possible instrument related outliers. The quality controlled carbon flux data sets were partitioned into gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Re) components utilizing light response and vapor pressure-based partitioning of carbon flux into GPP and Re components [2][3][4]. Partitioning the fluxes into GPP and Re facilitated a more functional filling of temporary flux tower data gaps [24].…”
Section: Flux Tower Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partitioning the fluxes into GPP and Re facilitated a more functional filling of temporary flux tower data gaps [24]. Partitioned and gap-filled GPP and Re and NEP used in this mapping effort were largely from focused regional flux tower synthesis for grain crops [4], leguminous crops [3], and grasslands [2]. We selected the carbon flux light response and vapor pressure, or "non-rectangular hyperbolic method" flux partitioning models [2][3][4] over Q 10 and short-term exponential fit models (which model Re as a function of temperature based on night-time data) and rectangular hyperbolic fit models (which use the relationship between photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and daytime NEP to model Re) because it produces the most reasonable C flux estimates and data gap filling [25], particularly in non-forest, low canopy height systems.…”
Section: Flux Tower Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations