2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-936870/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 supplementation eliminates sugar-rich media requirement for plant propagation using a simple inexpensive temporary immersion photobioreactor

Abstract: In-vitro plant propagation systems such as Temporary Immersion Bioreactors (TIBs) are valuable tools that enable production of disease-free plants with improved traits. However, TIB systems can be expensive, difficult to implement, and prone to contamination due to sugar rich propagation media. Using rapidly growing chicory root cultures to expedite design-build-test cycles, we report here an improved, low-cost version of a previously reported Hydrostatically-driven TIB (Hy-TIB) that facilitates economical use… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A one‐way analysis of variance was conducted on the plant growth model to demonstrate legitimacy of the model by comparing the model predictions with experimental results. It assessed the model as significant ( F calc = 97.5 F table = 18.5), and an F ‐Test on the Left‐Out‐Terms (LOT = residual − replicate error; Trauger et al, 2021) resulted in F calc = 1.62 < F table,0.05 = 5.59; thus, we conclude an adequate fit of model at greater than 95% confidence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A one‐way analysis of variance was conducted on the plant growth model to demonstrate legitimacy of the model by comparing the model predictions with experimental results. It assessed the model as significant ( F calc = 97.5 F table = 18.5), and an F ‐Test on the Left‐Out‐Terms (LOT = residual − replicate error; Trauger et al, 2021) resulted in F calc = 1.62 < F table,0.05 = 5.59; thus, we conclude an adequate fit of model at greater than 95% confidence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%