2022
DOI: 10.36518/2689-0216.1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Levels Behind and in Front of Different Protective Mask Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retracted 2021 study ( Christakis & Fontanarosa, 2021 ) and a similar 2022 study ( Akhondi et al, 2022 ) detract from the safety of masking by using CO2 meters to focus on gas levels behind masks, comparing those levels to standards meant for a surrounding environment. Claims are made that clinical symptoms of hypercapnia will ensue, while avoiding any measurement of a PaCO2 analogue or oxygen saturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The retracted 2021 study ( Christakis & Fontanarosa, 2021 ) and a similar 2022 study ( Akhondi et al, 2022 ) detract from the safety of masking by using CO2 meters to focus on gas levels behind masks, comparing those levels to standards meant for a surrounding environment. Claims are made that clinical symptoms of hypercapnia will ensue, while avoiding any measurement of a PaCO2 analogue or oxygen saturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into that topic was limited, with physiologic studies on mask-wearing pediatric subjects especially rare, and none compared the relative effects between children and adults. Yet in 2021 and 2022, four peer reviewed publications claimed that masking was physiologically harmful, with one evaluating the effect of masking on children ( Christakis & Fontanarosa, 2021 ; Elbl et al, 2021 ; Kisielinski et al, 2021 ; Akhondi et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%