2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2-brine-caprock interaction: Reactivity experiments on mudstone caprock of South-west Hub geo-sequestration project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The CO 2 solubility at 60 °C and 10 MPa is ∼23 cm 3 (STP) per gram of brine. 29 As a result of the dissolution of minerals such as kaolinite and muscovite, the pore volume of the caprock increases, 30 enhancing its flowability/permeability, 4 which is a disadvantage for caprock performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28 The CO 2 solubility at 60 °C and 10 MPa is ∼23 cm 3 (STP) per gram of brine. 29 As a result of the dissolution of minerals such as kaolinite and muscovite, the pore volume of the caprock increases, 30 enhancing its flowability/permeability, 4 which is a disadvantage for caprock performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCS or storing CO 2 in geological formations such as deep saline aquifers appears to be one of the major solutions to the reduction of anthropogenic CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere. , Moreover, the integrity of caprock over geological time scales is the most crucial factor for effective CO 2 storage in deep saline aquifers because it prevents CO 2 back-migration into groundwater bodies . During CO 2 injection, the wetting brine phase is displaced by nonwetting CO 2 , and the injected CO 2 remains in the supercritical state in the reservoir rock due to the aquifer’s high pressure and temperature . Because the viscosity and density of scCO 2 are lower than those of brine, the injected CO 2 tends to move upward and creates buoyancy pressure on the caprock, inducing stress changes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In energy science, the landmark description of porosity in sedimentary organic matter observed by SEM visualization of ion-milled samples of Barnett Shale 8 resulted in a paradigm-shifting focus on the fluid transport and storage properties of petroliferous mudstones, where SEM visualization is now broadly utilized for understanding fluid generation 9 11 , fluid migration 12 , and reservoir storage properties 13 , 14 . Such studies are relevant for carbon sequestration 15 and seal integrity 16 for natural petroleum reservoirs and energy gas storage (e.g., H 2 , CH 4 ). However, because of low atomic density, all sedimentary organic matter types appear similar (black) in electron microscopy 17 – 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the issues of climate change and global warming caused by excessive extraction and utilization of fossil energy have attracted attention from countries all over the world. Capturing the emitted CO 2 and injecting it underground to storage (CCS) has been confirmed to be an effective way for mitigating the continuous increase of atmosphere CO 2 levels, and the commonly considered formations for CO 2 storage are depleted oil and gas reservoirs, deep saline aquifers, and basalt formations. Moreover, the technology of injecting CO 2 into coal seams is also a promising approach that can achieve the dual benefits of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon sequestration. During this process, the wetting characteristics of the coal–water–CO 2 system play a critical role in evaluating the CO 2 injection rate, adsorption, migration, and trapping capacity, and containment security within the coal seams. , The existing literature has revealed that the wettability of the coal is affected by pressure, temperature, and brine salinity. Furthermore, Sun investigated the coal wettability at in situ pressures of CO 2 using molecular dynamics simulations. They proposed that CO 2 adsorption directly controlled the change in coal wettability until the adsorption of CO 2 reached saturation at high pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%