2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 and N2O emissions from Lou soils of greenhouse tomato fields under aerated irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its increase began to slow from the −20 cm mark where the concentration had exceeded 8.0×10 4 ppm. This result was opposite to that of Hou et al (2016) who found that CO 2 emissions increased under conditions of sufficient oxygen [18]. This difference in result occurred because CO 2 emissions are not equal to the CO 2 concentration.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…However, its increase began to slow from the −20 cm mark where the concentration had exceeded 8.0×10 4 ppm. This result was opposite to that of Hou et al (2016) who found that CO 2 emissions increased under conditions of sufficient oxygen [18]. This difference in result occurred because CO 2 emissions are not equal to the CO 2 concentration.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…2). Hou et al (2016) showed that aeration irrigation can increase soil respiration and promote the volatilization of soil CO 2 , but in our study, the soil respiration intensity of the aeration treatment was lower than that of CK treatment from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM after aeration treatment, due to aeration treatment promoting the exchange of gas in the root zone soil and decreasing the CO 2 content of soil in the root region. After that, the soil respiration intensity of the aeration treatment increased rapidly; this result is consistent with Hou et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…As presented in Figure 6, soil respiration showed fluctuated patterns during the whole tomato growing period, which varied from 139.19 to 748.64 mg·m −2 ·h −1 among treatments. Ranges of soil respiration in the present study was similar to the results of Hou et al [10] but was higher than the research of the same tomato cultivations [9]. Differences might be the results of different irrigation amount and weather condition based on the year of cultivation.…”
Section: Soil Respirationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Previously, studies on drivers of soil respiration have been largely conducted on soil water content, temperature, and the interaction of these two parameters [9,[11][12][13][14]. For AI treatment, a close correlation between soil CO 2 fluxes with soil water content and temperature has been confirmed [9,10]. Soil microbes and enzymes as biocatalysts for all biochemical reactions in the soil would decompose and Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation