1998
DOI: 10.1021/om9710428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Insertion Chemistry as a Probe of Organosamarium Allyl Reactivity

Abstract: CO2 reacts with (C5Me5)2Sm(η3-CH2CHCH2), 1, in toluene at room temperature and with (C5Me5)2Sm(η3-CH2CHCHR) (R = Me (2), Et (3)) in toluene at −78 °C to form [(C5Me5)2Sm(μ-O2CCH2CHCHR)]2 (R = H (4), Me (5) Et (6)) in >90% yield. In THF, 4−6 exist as solvated monometallic species, (C5Me5)2Sm(μ2-O2CCH2CHCHR)(THF). Crystallization of 4 from hexanes gives a bimetallic complex which contains an eight membered ring. CS2 reacts with 1 to form (C5Me5)2Sm(η2-S2CCH2CHCH2), 7, which isomerizes to (C5Me5)2Sm(η2-S2CC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
55
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
10
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benzyl ligand adopts an h 1 -coordination mode. The bond angle of C(25)eC(24)eSm(1) is 136.8 (7) , which is comparable with that in (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Sm(h 1 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 )(THF) [36] but much larger than those found in the complexes with a h 3 -or a h 2 -benzyl group: {(Me 3 Si) 2 NC(NCy) 2 } 2 Ln(h 3 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) (Cy ¼ C 6 H 11 ) [37] and {HC-(MeCNAr) 2 }La(h 2 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) 2 (THF) (Ar ¼ 2,6-iPr 2 C 6 H 3 ) [38]. The distance of Sm(1)/C(25) is 3.687(8) A, indicative of no interaction between Sm(1) and C (25).…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Lsmsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The benzyl ligand adopts an h 1 -coordination mode. The bond angle of C(25)eC(24)eSm(1) is 136.8 (7) , which is comparable with that in (C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Sm(h 1 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 )(THF) [36] but much larger than those found in the complexes with a h 3 -or a h 2 -benzyl group: {(Me 3 Si) 2 NC(NCy) 2 } 2 Ln(h 3 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) (Cy ¼ C 6 H 11 ) [37] and {HC-(MeCNAr) 2 }La(h 2 -CH 2 C 6 H 5 ) 2 (THF) (Ar ¼ 2,6-iPr 2 C 6 H 3 ) [38]. The distance of Sm(1)/C(25) is 3.687(8) A, indicative of no interaction between Sm(1) and C (25).…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Lsmsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These values are somewhat shorter than those of related [Cp* 2 Sm-(κ(S,S′)-S 2 CCHCHCH 3 )] (S−C bond lengths, 1.693(13) and 1.703(12) Å). 39 As obtained from XRD data of good quality (Table 1) present structure, electron delocalization in the S1C1S2 and S3C2S4 units is clear and S2−C2 is a single bond. However, the overall pattern of bond lengths in both structures is the same, and in particular the Sm−S distance in the Sm−C(S) chelate is shorter than those of the Sm−S 2 chelate (Figure 3).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Another interesting finding of this computational study is that, in all cases, insertion of styrene proceeds directly in the h 3 -coordinated allyl group; in other words, there is no need for an h 3 to h 1 haptotropic change in coordination, as might have been hypothesized. [28] Also, the up/ down orientation of the monomer during the insertion reaction has been underlined, with the styrene phenyl ring pointing (down) toward the Cp' ligand found at the DFT level to be the most thermodynamically and kinetically favorable one. The dramatic influence of the nature of the ancillary ligand bridge and of the "active" R (allyl or alkyl) group on the initiation process of styrene polymerization catalyzed by such ansa-lanthanidocene systems has been highlighted and rationalized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%