2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2FORMATION IN QUIESCENT CLOUDS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE CO + OH PATHWAY

Abstract: The formation of CO 2 in quiescent regions of molecular clouds is not yet fully understood, despite CO 2 having an abundance of around 10%-34% H 2 O. We present a study of the formation of CO 2 via the nonenergetic route CO + OH on nonporous H 2 O and amorphous silicate surfaces. Our results are in the form of temperature-programmed desorption spectra of CO 2 produced via two experimental routes: O 2 + CO + H and O 3 + CO + H. The maximum yield of CO 2 is around 8% with respect to the starting quantity of CO, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
114
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar conclusion is obtained by applying the same calculations to the fit of the CO 2 bending mode towards the field star Elias 16 shown by Mennella et al (2006). Although these are only two sources, this result to be confirmed along the line of sight to different quiescent clouds gives an indirect indication that CO 2 can also be formed in a early cloud stage through a different mechanism than for cosmic ray irradiation (e.g., surface reactions induced by non-energetic mechanisms; Oba et al 2010;Ioppolo et al 2011;Noble et al 2011). In a later stage, when ices are exposed to higher UV and cosmic ray doses, the total abundance of CO 2 is strongly affected by energetic formation mechanisms.…”
Section: Observational Constraintssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar conclusion is obtained by applying the same calculations to the fit of the CO 2 bending mode towards the field star Elias 16 shown by Mennella et al (2006). Although these are only two sources, this result to be confirmed along the line of sight to different quiescent clouds gives an indirect indication that CO 2 can also be formed in a early cloud stage through a different mechanism than for cosmic ray irradiation (e.g., surface reactions induced by non-energetic mechanisms; Oba et al 2010;Ioppolo et al 2011;Noble et al 2011). In a later stage, when ices are exposed to higher UV and cosmic ray doses, the total abundance of CO 2 is strongly affected by energetic formation mechanisms.…”
Section: Observational Constraintssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This complex can directly dissociate, forming solid CO 2 and leaving an H atom, or can be stabilized by intramolecular energy transfer to the ice surface and eventually react with an incoming H atom in a barrierless manner to form CO 2 and H 2 or other products with a purely statistical branching ratio (Goumans et al 2008). Recently, several independent experimental studies have shown that reaction 3 is an efficient surface CO 2 formation channel without energetic input (i.e., Oba et al 2010;Ioppolo et al 2011;Noble et al 2011). Moreover, reaction 3 can explain the observed formation link between CO 2 and H 2 O ice under interstellar conditions, since OH radicals are involved in the reaction scheme, and water can be efficiently formed through reactions OH + H and OH + H 2 (e.g., Romanzin et al 2011;Oba et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garrod et al (2007) have previously proposed a formula in their models that can be used to describe the chemical desorption (or reactive desorption). They derived the probability of A24, page 4 of 6 Bergeron et al (2008); (c) Al-Halabi & van Dishoeck (2007), Amiaud et al (2007); (d) Pirronello et al (1997); (e) Amiaud et al (2006) for low coverage; ( f ) Minissale et al (2015); (g) Dulieu et al (2013); (h) Speedy et al (1996), Fraser et al (2001 energy derived of 5800 K with pre-factor of 10 15 s −1 here corrected to have a pre-factor of 10 12 s −1 ; (i) Noble et al (2012a); ( (2)) that include division between the degree of freedom and the fraction of kinetic energy after bounce ( is mass dependent). In red we show the equal share of energy and the constant value of .…”
Section: Theoretical Estimate Of the Desorption Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent experimental studies it has clearly been shown that reaction 1 leads to CO 2 formation, although no consistent results were obtained concerning the activation barrier: little or barrierless in Oba et al (2011) and "high" (400 K) in Noble et al (2011). Reaction 2 has been studied theoretically (Talbi et al 2006;Goumans et al 2008), and those studies suggest there is a high activation barrier (2500−3000 K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%