1991
DOI: 10.1104/pp.96.3.713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2-Enhanced Yield and Foliar Deformation among Tomato Genotypes in Elevated CO2 Environments

Abstract: Yield increases observed among eight genotypes of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first clear conclusion from these results was that 1,500 ppm CO 2 is the best among the three conditions tested for the best yield of carbon in fruits in Micro-Tom cultivation with our system. In a previous report with a greenhouse, the fruit yield of tomato was enhanced by 7-34% by feeding CO 2 to 1,000 ppm (Tripp et al 1991). Our results for the enhancement of translocation of fixed carbon ( Figure 4B) seemed to be in agreement with these results, although it should be stressed that there are many differences between long-term acclimation and shortterm response to elevated CO 2 (Makino and Mae 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first clear conclusion from these results was that 1,500 ppm CO 2 is the best among the three conditions tested for the best yield of carbon in fruits in Micro-Tom cultivation with our system. In a previous report with a greenhouse, the fruit yield of tomato was enhanced by 7-34% by feeding CO 2 to 1,000 ppm (Tripp et al 1991). Our results for the enhancement of translocation of fixed carbon ( Figure 4B) seemed to be in agreement with these results, although it should be stressed that there are many differences between long-term acclimation and shortterm response to elevated CO 2 (Makino and Mae 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Tripp et al (1991) demonstrated that fruit yield of eight genotypes of tomato was enhanced by 7-34% by feeding CO 2 to 1,000 ppm in a greenhouse, and reported that the enhancement was directly correlated with decrease in root fresh weight, but not with increase in foliar photosynthetic activity. Duan et al (2014) employed 14 CO 2 and 18-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings to demonstrate that cultivation under increased CO 2 (780 ppm), in comparison with ambient CO 2 (390 ppm), conferred a higher capacity for translocation of photoassimilates from source leaves to sink organs probably by up-regulation of genes related to photosynthesis and sucrose transport, and of plasmodesmal biogenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nederhoff (1994) also reported that CO 2 elevation increased FDF in cucumber and sweet pepper plants, and maintained it in tomato plants. An increase in FDF by CO 2 elevation was reported by Tripp et al (1991) in 7 tomato cultivars. Similarly to these previous reports, no reduction of FDF by ECF was observed in Ab and Af (Fig.…”
Section: Difference In Effects Of Elevated Co 2 and Fogging On The Yimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevation of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration in a greenhouse was also described as effective to improve the yield of greenhouse crops (de Gelder et al, 2005;Fierro et al, 1994;Hicklenton and Jolliffe, 1978;Nederhoff, 1994;Tremblay and Gosselin, 1998;Tripp et al, 1991). CO 2 application had been unpopular in Japan since most greenhouse crops such as tomatoes were produced in simple plastic greenhouses without an environmental control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In later years 350 ppm CO 2 was used as the reference point. Assuming a starting point of 350 ppm CO 2 , early research showed that C 3 photosynthesis crop yields (temperate dicots and cereals such as soybean, peanut, dry bean, rice, and wheat) increased about 30% with a doubling of CO 2 , from 350 to 700 ppm for rice (Baker et al 1990;Baker et al 1992;Baker et al 1995), peanuts (Prasad et al 2003), common beans (Prasad et al 2002) Reddy et al 2000), and tomatoes (Tripp et al 1991). Except for sweet corn (which is a C 4 plant), all of Florida's vegetable crops, fruits, and citrus are C 3 species and are presumed to have CO 2 responses similar to the other C 3 crops (for details see summaries of measured crop response to CO 2 reviewed by Backlund et al (2009) and Kimball et al (2002), and crop model responses to CO 2 reviewed by Boote et al (2010)).…”
Section: Florida's Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%