Abstract:Concerns regarding global warming have increased the pressure on automobile manufacturers to decrease emissions of CO 2 from vehicles. Diesel vehicles have higher fuel economy and lower CO 2 emissions than their gasoline counterparts. Increased penetration of diesel powered vehicles into the market is a possible transition strategy toward a more sustainable transportation system. To facilitate discussions regarding the relative merits of diesel vehicles it is important to have a clear understanding of their CO… Show more
“…Section 6 concludes. rate of a vehicle is proportional to the fuel consumption rate of the vehicle, with the proportionality factor differing across diesel and gasoline engines (Sullivan et al, 2004), so this cutoff is equivalent to 8.4 liters/100 km for gasoline cars and 7.5 liters/100 km for diesel cars.…”
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Terms of use:
Documents in
AbstractMany countries have adopted policies designed to reduce CO 2 emissions from road vehicles. Taxes linked to the CO 2 emissions rate or the fuel economy of a vehicle (which is inversely related to its CO 2 emissions rate) are examples of such policies. These taxes are usually imposed on new vehicles, and previous evaluations have estimated the increases in the shares or sales of new and fuel-efficient vehicles associated with such taxes. In contrast, we ask whether taxes on new cars that penalize high emitters induce changes in the retirement of used and inefficient vehicles. We exploit natural experiment conditions in Switzerland to analyze the impact of two different "bonus"/"malus" schemes implemented at the cantonal level. In both schemes, the bonus rewards new efficient vehicles. The malus is retroactive in canton Obwalden, in the sense that it is charged on both new and existing high-emitting cars, but it is only applied prospectively to new cars in Geneva. We use a difference-in-difference design within a survival analysis setting. We find that a bonus/malus accelerates the retirement of existing high-emitting vehicles in Obwalden, shortening the expected lifetime of the three most popular make-models by 7 to 11 months. The effect is the opposite in Geneva, where we estimate that the expected lifetime of these three popular models is extended by 5 to 8 months. These findings have important implications about the desirability of bonus/malus schemes and on their design, as well as on old car scrappage programs.
“…Section 6 concludes. rate of a vehicle is proportional to the fuel consumption rate of the vehicle, with the proportionality factor differing across diesel and gasoline engines (Sullivan et al, 2004), so this cutoff is equivalent to 8.4 liters/100 km for gasoline cars and 7.5 liters/100 km for diesel cars.…”
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Terms of use:
Documents in
AbstractMany countries have adopted policies designed to reduce CO 2 emissions from road vehicles. Taxes linked to the CO 2 emissions rate or the fuel economy of a vehicle (which is inversely related to its CO 2 emissions rate) are examples of such policies. These taxes are usually imposed on new vehicles, and previous evaluations have estimated the increases in the shares or sales of new and fuel-efficient vehicles associated with such taxes. In contrast, we ask whether taxes on new cars that penalize high emitters induce changes in the retirement of used and inefficient vehicles. We exploit natural experiment conditions in Switzerland to analyze the impact of two different "bonus"/"malus" schemes implemented at the cantonal level. In both schemes, the bonus rewards new efficient vehicles. The malus is retroactive in canton Obwalden, in the sense that it is charged on both new and existing high-emitting cars, but it is only applied prospectively to new cars in Geneva. We use a difference-in-difference design within a survival analysis setting. We find that a bonus/malus accelerates the retirement of existing high-emitting vehicles in Obwalden, shortening the expected lifetime of the three most popular make-models by 7 to 11 months. The effect is the opposite in Geneva, where we estimate that the expected lifetime of these three popular models is extended by 5 to 8 months. These findings have important implications about the desirability of bonus/malus schemes and on their design, as well as on old car scrappage programs.
“…The CO 2 emissions of the KBA file are used, assuming the same annual mileage for the current and future gasoline and Diesel passenger cars. In a first stage, the CO 2 emissions are calculated using the current data; in a second one, the future CO 2 emissions are estimated taking into account the most probable future technologies (Sullivan et al, 2004). This study is limited to CO 2 emissions from new registered passenger cars.…”
Section: Assumptions and Methodology Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study (Sullivan et al, 2004), showed a significant decrease of CO 2 emissions in the USA by the introduction of Diesel passenger cars. This study did not take into account a sales-weighted approach.…”
One efficient way to control the CO 2 emissions from the transport sector is the replacement of gasoline passenger cars by Diesel ones, which emit less CO 2 . This can be more effective in Finland, where the Diesel penetration is only 13.6%, which is very low compared to the other member countries of the European Union. The benefit in CO 2 emitted from the new passenger cars is studied in the case of an increased Diesel penetration in this country, after several scenarios using the current and estimated future passenger car registrations and the fuel consumption. The results show that, in the case of new passenger cars, a CO 2 benefit of more than 2.6% can be achieved, if a Diesel penetration higher than 30% occurs in the case of the current fleet. If the penetration reaches 50%, this benefit reaches 5.9%. Future total CO 2 emissions from transport sector will increase significantly and can be partially controlled by the introduction of Diesel passenger cars or the replacement of heavy passenger cars by lighter ones.
“…Assuming a density of 700 kg/m3, 1 kg of gasoline produces 3.42 kg of CO2 (tank to wheel emissions). Sullivan et al 2004 consider a multiplying factor of 1.162 to pass from TTW to WTW emissions of CO2. Thus, a kg of gasoline can be assumed to produce 3.98 kg of CO2 (WTW).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.