2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00368.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2‐CONCENTRATING MECHANISMS OF THE POTENTIALLY TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE PROTOCERATIUM RETICULATUM (DINOPHYCEAE, GONYAULACALES)1

Abstract: The low CO 2 concentration in seawater poses severe restrictions on photosynthesis, especially on those species with form II RUBISCO. We found that the potentially toxic dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum Clap. et J. Lachm. possesses a form II RUBISCO. To cast some light on the mechanisms this organism undergoes to cope with low CO 2 availability, we compared cells grown at atmospheric (370 ppm) and high (5000 ppm) CO 2 concentrations, with respect to a number of physiological parameters related to disso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(117 reference statements)
9
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marine dinoflagellates Prorocentrum minimum, Heterocapsa triquetra, Ceratium lineatum, and Protoceratium reticulatum all appear to regulate their CCM activity through differential expression of carbonic anhydrases (CAs) in response to changes in external CO 2 concentration (Rost et al 2006;Ratti et al 2007); such a capacity is clearly beneficial to tolerate large changes of pCO 2 , and hence pH in the case of these species, associated with dinoflagellate blooms (Rost et al 2006;Ratti et al 2007). Thus, a similar regulatory (buffering) mechanism could exist for phylotype A13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine dinoflagellates Prorocentrum minimum, Heterocapsa triquetra, Ceratium lineatum, and Protoceratium reticulatum all appear to regulate their CCM activity through differential expression of carbonic anhydrases (CAs) in response to changes in external CO 2 concentration (Rost et al 2006;Ratti et al 2007); such a capacity is clearly beneficial to tolerate large changes of pCO 2 , and hence pH in the case of these species, associated with dinoflagellate blooms (Rost et al 2006;Ratti et al 2007). Thus, a similar regulatory (buffering) mechanism could exist for phylotype A13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of marine phytoplankton exhibit effective CCMs, which allow them to grow rather independently from CO 2 availability (e.g. Rost et al 2006, Fu et al 2007, Ratti et al 2007). This does not mean, however, that species do not benefit from increasing CO 2 concentrations.…”
Section: Reallocation Of Energy From Ccm Down-regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical dinoflagellate response to a reduced concentration of dissolved CO 2 is an increase in amount and per-cell-activity of the enzymes involved in the dehydration of HCO 3 , the extracellular and intracellular carbonic anhydrases (CAs) (Berman-Frank et al, 1994;Ratti et al, 2007). We identified an extracellular d-CA similar to that of the bloom-forming marine dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum see Toulza et al, 2010), as well as an intracellular CA, which were both significantly higher expressed in the stationary-phase control cultures than in the exponentially growing control (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Gene Expression Specifically Linked To Stationary Phase In Cmentioning
confidence: 99%