2011
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201000491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Capture for Fossil Fuel‐Fired Power Plants

Abstract: Review:In an overview of technologies for fossil fuel-fired power plants with drastically reduced CO 2 emissions the three main technologies postcombustion capture, pre-combustion capture, and oxyfuel technology are presented and compared. Postcombustion capture using reactive absorption is discussed in detail due to its potential for application on a large scale in the near future. Research Article: Methanol with the potential to be synthesized via renewable feedstocks is a good substitution for petroleum fue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CO 2 capture technologies are typically including precombustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel-combustion. However, the efficiency loss was estimated from 6 to 14% for the above CO 2 capture technologies due to the operation of additional units to obtain high purity CO 2 ; in addition, for economical point of view, the cost for CO 2 capture, transportation and sequestration were estimated as 30 to 60 €/t CO2 (Notz et al, 2011), which is much higher than the price of CO 2 emission rights in European Energy Exchange (EEX) approximately 2.5 to 5.0 €/t CO2 in 2013. Hence, the CO 2 capture technologies should be substantially increased their energy efficiency to meet the economical requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO 2 capture technologies are typically including precombustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel-combustion. However, the efficiency loss was estimated from 6 to 14% for the above CO 2 capture technologies due to the operation of additional units to obtain high purity CO 2 ; in addition, for economical point of view, the cost for CO 2 capture, transportation and sequestration were estimated as 30 to 60 €/t CO2 (Notz et al, 2011), which is much higher than the price of CO 2 emission rights in European Energy Exchange (EEX) approximately 2.5 to 5.0 €/t CO2 in 2013. Hence, the CO 2 capture technologies should be substantially increased their energy efficiency to meet the economical requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of amine based technologies for separation of CO 2 from flue gases is faced with a number of technical challenges. The major disadvantage of this method is its high energy requirements associated with the regeneration of the solvent, thereby affecting the reduction of the energy efficiency by about 9-11 absolute percentage points, depending on the solvent used (Figueroa et al, 2008;Notz et al, 2011;Steeneveldt et al, 2006). The solvents that have been proven to be of principal commercial interest are primary amines: monoethanolamine (MEA) and giglycolamine (DGA), the secondary amines: diethanolamine (DEA) and diisopropanolamine (DIPA) and the tertiary amines: methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) and triethanolamine (TEA) (Kohl and Riesenfeld, 1997;Vaidya and Kenig, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since large amounts of OCs are required in large-scale continuous CLC reactors with increasing sizes, the laboratory-scale preparation methods cannot meet the demand [18]. Several methods have been adopted to prepare OC particles for large-scale continuous CLC systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%