2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-state initialization for the minimum-time low-thrust trajectory optimization

Abstract: This paper presents an approach for co-state initialization which is a critical step in solving minimum-time low-thrust trajectory optimization problems using indirect optimal control numerical methods. Indirect methods used in determining the optimal space trajectories typically result in two-point boundary-value problems and are solved by single-or multiple-shooting numerical methods. Accurate initialization of the co-state variables facilitates the numerical convergence of iterative boundary value problem s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, deriving the first-order optimal necessary conditions is challenging in this case [137]. For some special low-thrust orbits, Lawden [138] described the first-order optimal necessary conditions based on the primer vector theory.…”
Section: Figure 15: Optimal Design Approaches Of Low-thrust Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, deriving the first-order optimal necessary conditions is challenging in this case [137]. For some special low-thrust orbits, Lawden [138] described the first-order optimal necessary conditions based on the primer vector theory.…”
Section: Figure 15: Optimal Design Approaches Of Low-thrust Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the problem has been solved using optimal control theory from Section 2.1, and for this we can cite the books (Longuski et al, 2014;Lawden, 1963;Bryson Jr. and Ho, 1975;Kirk, 1970;Conway, 2014). Numerous solution methods have been studied, including methods based on primer vector theory (Russell, 2007;Petropoulos and Russell, 2008;Restrepo and Russell, 2017), direct methods based on solving an NLP (Betts, 2000;Arrieta-Camacho and Biegler, 2005;Ross et al, 2007;Starek and Kolmanovsky, 2012;Rao, 2015, 2016), and indirect methods (Alfano and Thorne, 1994;Fernandes, 1995;Kechichian, 1995;Haberkorn et al, 2004;Gong et al, 2008;Gil-Fernandez and Gomez-Tierno, 2010;Zimmer et al, 2010;Pan et al, 2012;Pontani and Conway, 2013;Cerf, 2016;Taheri et al, 2016Taheri et al, , 2017Rasotto et al, 2015;Lizia et al, 2014). Some recent advances for indirect methods include homotopy methods (Pan et al, 2019;Pan and Pan, 2020;Cerf et al, 2011), optimal switching surfaces (Taheri and Junkins, 2019), the RASHS and CSC approaches from Section 2.5.2 (Saranathan and Grant, 2018;Taheri et al, 2020a,b), and simultaneous optimization (also known as co-optimization) of the trajectory and the spacecraft design parameters (Arya et al, 2020).…”
Section: Orbit Transfer and Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the final mass is free, the transversality conditions in (16) tell that the final mass costate should be zero…”
Section: Statement Of the Problem A Minimum-fuel Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since only the first-order necessary conditions are considered, the TPBVP trends to have many local extremums that satisfy all these conditions [15]. Therefore, the main difficulties in using the indirect methods consist of two parts: the sensitivity of the local solutions to the initial guesses for the unknowns caused by the strong nonlinearity and discontinuous integrated functions [16], and finding the best solution among many local solutions [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%