2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-solvent and temperature effect on conformation and hydration of polypropylene and polyethylene oxides in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…62 Once this condition is fulfilled, because of a significant shift of ε 1 in the right-hand side of inequality (eq 25), which is often not small (on the order of about 5 k B T for the strength of hydrogen bonds), inequality (eq 25) predicts that it breaks down only when the value of μ is far away from zero, which particularly corresponds to the case of very low concentrations of the cosolvent, such as shown for the collapsed branch of cononsolvency in Figure 10. This prediction concurs with recent atomistic simulations on the cononsolvency of polypropylene oxide 55 in isobutyric acid aqueous solutions, where the concentration of cosolvent isobutyric acid in binary mixed solvents is rather small when polymer collapse starts to occur.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62 Once this condition is fulfilled, because of a significant shift of ε 1 in the right-hand side of inequality (eq 25), which is often not small (on the order of about 5 k B T for the strength of hydrogen bonds), inequality (eq 25) predicts that it breaks down only when the value of μ is far away from zero, which particularly corresponds to the case of very low concentrations of the cosolvent, such as shown for the collapsed branch of cononsolvency in Figure 10. This prediction concurs with recent atomistic simulations on the cononsolvency of polypropylene oxide 55 in isobutyric acid aqueous solutions, where the concentration of cosolvent isobutyric acid in binary mixed solvents is rather small when polymer collapse starts to occur.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The latter interaction will be typically weaker as compared to the hydrogen bonding, thus determining the strength of the coupling effect. This concept is supported by a recent atomistic simulation study on the cononsolvency of polypropylene oxide in isobutyric acid aqueous solutions, where cosolvent isobutyric acid can form stable hydrogen bonds with monomers and the isobutyric acid-modified monomers act as hydrophobic nucleation sites for polymer collapse . We note this concept is also supported by a recent experimental study on co-condensation of proteins and DNA, where experiments showed that the protein fused-in-sarcoma adsorbs strongly on ssDNA and tails of adsorbed proteins attract each other (dimerization).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Co-solvent localization and potential changes in the micelle structure occurring within the initial 130 ns after introduction of 5% (by volume) alcohols of different hydrophobicities (ethanol, butanol, hexanol) are analyzed together with the dynamics of solvent exchange in the micelle core. In the case of a diblock copolymer, we also investigate the effect of addition of glycine or isobutyric acid, which are capable of stronger hydrogen bonding with polyethers , than simple alcohols. We compare our results with available experimental literature data and make conclusions regarding the micelle sensitivity to the presence of co-solvent for different polymer architectures that provide important insights regarding the interpretation of experimental data and applications of Pluronic micelles in the biomedical area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with the PPO block within the NP being hydrated, albeit much less so than the PEO block. 55 Further confirmation of this was achieved by heating these solutions to their critical micelle temperature (CMT) at which point the PPO block would dehydrate. 57 For spectra recorded above CMT, the difference between H2O and D2O emission intensities was small at only 1.2.…”
Section: Cell Imaging With Np1-p188mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is plausible as the oxygen atoms within both the PEO and PPO components of P188 are known to form hydrogen bonds with water molecules. 55 This would position 1 in a hydrated microenvironment close to water which would quench emission and broaden absorbance bands. To confirm a role of water in quenching the emission of 1 when confined within NP1-P188 particle, the measurable albeit weak fluorescence spectrum of NP1-P188 was compared in H2O and D2O (Figure 13A).…”
Section: Cell Imaging With Np1-p188mentioning
confidence: 99%