2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-015-0484-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-simulation to evaluate acceleration performance and fuel consumption of hybrid vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The third optimization criterion is related to the EV performance as compared with the velocities profiles of the simulated cycles. In this paper, the vehicle performance is evaluated by the correlation coefficient R as in Eckert et al 13,27 The R value defined by Equation 24 provides a numerical value that measures the vehicle capacity to reproduce the target cycle speed profile, comparing the results performed by the current vehicle speed V of EV in the first cycle loop simulation (Figure 2) with the target speed values V c (considering discrete time intervals i of 0.1 s).…”
Section: Optimization Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third optimization criterion is related to the EV performance as compared with the velocities profiles of the simulated cycles. In this paper, the vehicle performance is evaluated by the correlation coefficient R as in Eckert et al 13,27 The R value defined by Equation 24 provides a numerical value that measures the vehicle capacity to reproduce the target cycle speed profile, comparing the results performed by the current vehicle speed V of EV in the first cycle loop simulation (Figure 2) with the target speed values V c (considering discrete time intervals i of 0.1 s).…”
Section: Optimization Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The configuration that aims to minimize the HESS mass (min( 1 )) also represents the minimum drive range (66.38 km) reached by the optimum solutions ( Figure 5A,D), using an HESS composed of a 181.77 V battery with 90.86 Ah capacity (M bat = 137.64 kg), associated with a pack of 4 ultracapacitors Cap (7) (M cap = 34 kg). This configuration drive uses the battery pack until the EV reaches the US06 driving cycle (2650 s) that is characterized by high acceleration stretches 17,27 that increase the vehicle power demand. Due to this, the HESS required current I overcomes the battery discharge limit I lim that enables the PMC to complete the demand with the ultracapacitors power (I cap = I − I lim ).…”
Section: Minimum Hess Mass Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations were performed by an integration between the multibody dynamic analysis program Adams TM and the Simulink/Matlab TM which provides an interface to control the multibody vehicle model by means of the Adams TM plugin Adams/Controls TM as proposed in [3]. The set of equations described previously were implemented in Simulink TM to estimate the vehicle power demand, the gear shifting strategy, and the power split between the ICE and electric systems for the PHEV simulations.…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the vehicle must discharge the battery until it reaches a minimum SoC of 30%-45% depending on battery type and on the powertrain configuration [2], [22]. In this paper the battery SoC is limited to 40% as in [3].…”
Section: Phev Eletric Drive Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation