2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2824341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Simulation of Distributed Smart Grid Software Using Direct-Execution Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, INSPIRE is limited on simulating the interactions between both Components and Communication Layers in SGAM. Shum et al [12] presented a more complex ad-hoc co-simulation platform based on HLA and JADE, a popular multi-agent platform. The platform integrates OPNET with the commercial electromagnetic transient simulator PSCAD/EMTDC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, INSPIRE is limited on simulating the interactions between both Components and Communication Layers in SGAM. Shum et al [12] presented a more complex ad-hoc co-simulation platform based on HLA and JADE, a popular multi-agent platform. The platform integrates OPNET with the commercial electromagnetic transient simulator PSCAD/EMTDC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to [10], [11], [12], GECO [13] exploits a different approach to create a co-simulation environment between PSLF and ns-2. In GECO, co-simulation is achieved through a global event-driven mechanism to manage the co-simulation orchestration instead of HLA technology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CORE) and (iii) Open Platform Communication based on FreeOPCUA. A more complex ad hoc approach has been proposed in [22] where JADE, a popular multi-agent platform, has been connected to both PSCAD electromagnetic transient simulator and OPNET.…”
Section: Co-simulation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former, as seen in previous literature [13~15], studied computer visualization but did not realize the interface with the system simulation algorithm. There are also many studies on the latter: literature [16] studied a real-time simulation platform of a 400 V-50 KVA digital physics hybrid power system; literature [17] studied a real-time simulation technology for power system design, testing and analysis; literature [18] proposed an integrated modelling and simulation analysis of engineering complex systems; and literature [19] applied the DecompositionJ framework and co-simulation platform to power grid research. These studies only examined system simulation models and did not realize system visualization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%