2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-segmentation via visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the proposed method is evaluated and compared with different previously proposed techniques (Meng et al, 2012;Dai et al, 2013;Faktor and Irani, 2013;Jerripothula et al, 2014;Jerripothula et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2015;Kamranian et al, 2018) using IoU metric. This metric is calculated as the intersection area of the segmented foreground and the ground truth to their union.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the proposed method is evaluated and compared with different previously proposed techniques (Meng et al, 2012;Dai et al, 2013;Faktor and Irani, 2013;Jerripothula et al, 2014;Jerripothula et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2015;Kamranian et al, 2018) using IoU metric. This metric is calculated as the intersection area of the segmented foreground and the ground truth to their union.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both tables, the average of the IoU is calculated for each class because each dataset has a massive number of images. It will be noticed that some results of methods (Meng et al, 2016;Kamranian et al, 2018) are missed; this is because the results are gotten from their original paper. However, the results of the other methods are obtained from (Lu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation