Medical Imaging 2015: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography 2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2084529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-robotic ultrasound tomography: dual arm setup and error analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown, in reference , the feasibility of tomographic image reconstruction given errors in the range of several millimeters. Further improvement can be achieved by looking at the ultrasound signals or by using more robust‐to‐error reconstruction methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have shown, in reference , the feasibility of tomographic image reconstruction given errors in the range of several millimeters. Further improvement can be achieved by looking at the ultrasound signals or by using more robust‐to‐error reconstruction methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many recent applications have integrated robotic arms or tracking systems to US imaging [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. In such systems, US calibration is a necessary task to localize 3D position and orientation of the US image, or US transmitter/receivers in the robot tooltip, tracked marker, or other coordinate frames (called "moving frame," while the fixed frame, e.g., robot base or tracking system, is called "world's frame").…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3), the problem of the serial-parallel hybrid robot system [23] is cast as the toolgripper (X), flange-base (Y ) and camera-base (Z) calibrations. The same mathematical modeling also exists in co-robotic ultrasound (US) tomography where two hand-eye and one robot-robot calibrations are needed [1]. However, relatively little work has been done on AXB = Y CZ calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%