CO-RIP: A Riparian Vegetation and Corridor Extent Dataset for Colorado River Basin Streams and Rivers

Abstract

Here we present “CO-RIP”, a novel spatial dataset delineating riparian corridors and riparian vegetation along large streams and rivers in the United States (U.S.) portion of the Colorado River Basin. The consistent delineation of riparian areas across large areas using remote sensing has been a historically complicated process partially due to differing definitions in the scientific and management communities regarding what a “riparian corridor” or “riparian vegetation” represents. We use valley-bottoms to define the riparian corridor and establish a riparian vegetation definition interpretable from aerial imagery for efficient, consistent, and broad-scale mapping. Riparian vegetation presence and absence data were collected using a systematic, flexible image interpretation process applicable wherever high resolution imagery is available. We implemented a two-step approach using existing valley bottom delineation methods and random forests classification models that integrate Landsat spectral information to delineate riparian corridors and vegetation across the 12 ecoregions of the Colorado River Basin. Riparian vegetation model accuracy was generally strong (median kappa of 0.80), however it varied across ecoregions (kappa range of 0.42–0.90). We offer suggestions for improvement in our current image interpretation and modelling frameworks, particularly encouraging additional research in mapping riparian vegetation in moist coniferous forest and deep canyon environments. The CO-RIP dataset created through this research is publicly available and can be utilized in a wide range of ecological applications.

A New Pseudoinvariant Near-Infrared Threshold Method for Relative Radiometric Correction of Aerial Imagery

“…It is available at the spatial resolution of 0.6 to 2 meters with very low cloud coverage and consists of repeat images during the growing season with two or three year cycles for more than 15 years [1]. It has been a unique choice for a variety of geospatial mapping applications, such as analysis of land cover and land use change [2][3][4], evaluation of ecosystem services [5][6][7], monitoring of forest health [8][9][10][11], and assessment of urban green infrastructure [12,13]. The NAIP imagery will likely continue to be the one of the best data sources for many research and operational efforts that need high-resolution multispectral imagery for feature extraction, change detection, or collection of ground truth for validate coarse-resolution satellite products.…”

Comparing Sentinel-1 Surface Water Mapping Algorithms and Radiometric Terrain Correction Processing in Southeast Asia Utilizing Google Earth Engine

“…Specifically, the validation dataset was generated utilizing a simple random approach distributed over the corresponding Planet Scope imagery associated with individual flood dates. The validation samples were classified using a digital ocular sampling approach [68,69]. An individual sampler performed a visual interpretation on the Planet Scope imagery, constraining the interpretation to a 3 × 3 pixel neighborhood equating to the approximate resolution of the surface water products generated (10 m GSD).…”

Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions

“…Also regarding the quality of input data, the riparian zone can be estimated in a more sophisticated way. The application of a standard riparian distance to all waterbodies could be improved by instead using variable riparian buffer distances based on the size of waterbodies and bank geomorphology, as suggested by other studies [15,24].…”

“…The most commonly used wetland remote sensing data are Landsat multispectral imagery, which as of Landsat 8 is 30 m in resolution for most bands, repeats its cycle every 16 days, includes 11 bands, and is freely available [13]. Researchers have achieved accurate wetland identification results by incorporating Landsat imagery, specifically from the Landsat 8 Operational Land Imagery (OLI) satellite (e.g., [14][15][16][17][18]). At this spatial resolution, however, it is unlikely that approaches could identify exact wetland locations obtained through field delineations by experts, but it is possible that such data could rule out large areas as not being likely to include wetlands.…”