2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-017-4926-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-regularized multiview nonnegative matrix factorization with correlation constraint for representation learning

Abstract: With the increasing availability of multiview nonnegative data in real applications, multiview representation learning based on nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has attracted more and more attentions. However, existing NMF-based methods are sensitive to noises and are difficult to generate discriminative features with noisy views. To address these problems, we propose a co-regularized multiview nonnegative matrix factorization method with correlation constraint for nonnegative representation learning, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most existing multiview clustering methods can be classified into three major categories, namely, multiview spectral clustering methods, 8,9,[11][12][13] multiview subspace clustering methods, 7,[19][20][21][22][23] and multiview nonnegative matrix factorization clustering methods. [24][25][26][27][28][29] Although the three categories of methods are based on diverse theories, they have the same main idea, in other words, all these methods are designed to combine information from multiview data (or representations) into a common representation, pursuing the consensus information among all views. 6,9,27,30 The difference among these methods lies in terms of the way in which the multiview information is integrated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing multiview clustering methods can be classified into three major categories, namely, multiview spectral clustering methods, 8,9,[11][12][13] multiview subspace clustering methods, 7,[19][20][21][22][23] and multiview nonnegative matrix factorization clustering methods. [24][25][26][27][28][29] Although the three categories of methods are based on diverse theories, they have the same main idea, in other words, all these methods are designed to combine information from multiview data (or representations) into a common representation, pursuing the consensus information among all views. 6,9,27,30 The difference among these methods lies in terms of the way in which the multiview information is integrated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed over the years for the analysis of multi-view data. They include techniques on clustering [Ye et al, 2018, Ou et al, 2018, classification [Shu et al, 2019], regression [Li et al, 2019], dimensionality reduction [Sun, 2013] and more [Xu et al, 2013, Zhao et al, 2017. However, the literature mostly lacks efficient algorithms that allow the construction of a single visualisation, through the simultaneous analysis of multiple data-views.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistency represents the common information of multiple views, and complementarity represents the special information of each view. Only consistency and complementarity of multiple views can be utilized to improve the performance of learning tasks [5,10,2,12], however, both consistency and complementarity are significant that it is a waste of information if we ignore one of them. In [11], they find a joint latent representation which include both common and special features of multiple views, and followed this work, [16] made some improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%