2020
DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2020.1733954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production of knowledge for sustainability: an application of reflective practice in doctoral studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comberti et al ( 2019 ) push for more than just bridging or integrating knowledge systems, calling for the demarginalisation of Indigenous Peoples within the UNFCCC based on substantive and collaborative engagement. This aligns with other scholars, such as Reed et al ( 2020 ), who call for the concept of braiding knowledge systems to understand the multiple ontological and epistemological foundations that enter into knowledge valuation and co-production in a process of mutual respect, kindness, and generosity. This type of engagement can have a positive impact on Indigenous Peoples’ rights because it allows for the inclusion of the various components of Indigenous Peoples’ knowledge systems (Orlove et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comberti et al ( 2019 ) push for more than just bridging or integrating knowledge systems, calling for the demarginalisation of Indigenous Peoples within the UNFCCC based on substantive and collaborative engagement. This aligns with other scholars, such as Reed et al ( 2020 ), who call for the concept of braiding knowledge systems to understand the multiple ontological and epistemological foundations that enter into knowledge valuation and co-production in a process of mutual respect, kindness, and generosity. This type of engagement can have a positive impact on Indigenous Peoples’ rights because it allows for the inclusion of the various components of Indigenous Peoples’ knowledge systems (Orlove et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Self-reflexive work has rarely been investigated to construe how transdisciplinary and transformative research procedures affect individual researchers or collaborative research teams, "how scholars make sense of these processes&#8221 (Knaggård et al 2018), and how they can achieve a higher degree of reflexivity. Moreover, few systematic suggestions for practice based on the insights of such an analysis exist to help researchers implement the reflexive practices that are communicated as essential for transdisciplinary and transformative research (e.g., Reed et al 2020): How do researchers develop and cultivate these reflexive practices? What kind of training, exercises, and attitudes do they need to remain reflexive when faced with the challenges of transdisciplinary and transformative research processes?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%