Co-production of knowledge for climate-resilient design and planning in Naples, Italy

Visconti, Cristina

doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102748

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This pathway considers that in every scientific inquiry into real-life social systems, such as urban systems, knowledge production requires social validity that comes from consultation and collaboration with willing social actors. While the co-production of knowledge in urban ecology is not a new concept (Cadenasso and Pickett 2018 ), it is receiving increased attention as a mode of active engagement of diverse actors in framing social conditions for transformative and sustainable urban solutions (Frantzeskaki and Kabisch 2016 ; Kabisch 2019 ; Visconti 2023 ; Wickenberg 2023 ). We argue that the continuous interactions between knowledge inputs and social action must be both conceptualized and grounded in empirical experiments and evidence.…”

Section: Unpacking the Transformation Shiftmentioning

confidence: 99%

A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities

Frantzeskaki,

Childers,

Pickett

et al. 2024

Ambio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper builds on the expansion of urban ecology from a biologically based discipline—ecology in the city—to an increasingly interdisciplinary field—ecology of the city—to a transdisciplinary, knowledge to action endeavor—an ecology for and with the city. We build on this “prepositional journey” by proposing a transformative shift in urban ecology, and we present a framework for how the field may continue this shift. We conceptualize that urban ecology is in a state of flux, and that this shift is needed to transform urban ecology into a more engaged and action based field, and one that includes a diversity of actors willing to participate in the future of their cities. In this transformative shift, these actors will engage, collaborate, and participate in a continuous spiral of knowledge → action → knowledge spiral and back to knowledge loop, with the goal of co producing sustainable and resilient solutions to myriad urban challenges. Our framework for this transformative shift includes three pathways: (1) a repeating knowledge → action → knowledge spiral of ideas, information, and solutions produced by a diverse community of agents of urban change working together in an “urban sandbox”; (2) incorporation of a social–ecological–technological systems framework in this spiral and expanding the spiral temporally to include the “deep future,” where future scenarios are based on a visioning of seemingly unimaginable or plausible future states of cities that are sustainable and resilient; and (3) the expansion of the spiral in space, to include rural areas and places that are not yet cities. The three interrelated pathways that define the transformative shift demonstrate the power of an urban ecology that has moved beyond urban systems science and into a realm where collaborations among diverse knowledges and voices are working together to understand cities and what is urban while producing sustainable solutions to contemporary challenges and envisioning futures of socially, ecologically, and technologically resilient cities. We present case study examples of each of the three pathways that make up this transformative shift in urban ecology and discuss both limitations and opportunities for future research and action with this transdisciplinary broadening of the field.

show abstract

Section: Unpacking the Transformation Shiftmentioning

confidence: 99%

A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities

Frantzeskaki,

Childers,

Pickett

et al. 2024

Ambio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Palestinos (2018), the ability to successfully adjust in the face of danger or calamity is known as resilience. Furthermore, it is not a trait you are born with or not.…”

Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Teaching Approaches on Students’ Behavior and Performance in Athletics Events “Input for Students’ Guide”

M. Gida

2024

IJRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study determined the relationship between teaching approaches on students' behavior and performance in athletics events. The result of this study will serve as input for the students' guide. Specifically, this sought to determine the level of teaching approaches in terms of interactive discussion; demonstration; and peer mentoring, the level of students' behavior in terms of self-discipline, teamwork, sportsmanship, integrity, resilience; and determination, the level of students' performance in athletics events in terms of practical tests, the relationship between teaching approaches and students' behavior, and the relationship between teaching approaches and students' performance. This research uses a descriptive-quantitative method that uses a purposive sampling technique. The respondents were 100 students from Sisters of Mary of Banneux Inc. School year 2023-2024. A self-made survey questionnaire was used in this study.Findings show that the level of teaching approaches in terms of interactive discussion, demonstration, and peer mentoring appears to be highly evident among the respondents. Moreover, the level of students' behavior in terms of self-discipline, teamwork, sportsmanship, integrity, resilience; and determination appears to be highly evident among the respondents. Furthermore, the level of students' performance in athletic events in terms of practical tests students' performance in athletic event in terms of practical test with regards to running, jumping and throwing are heterogeneous. Lastly, the relationship between teaching approaches and students' behavior, and the relationship between teaching approaches and students' performance are both significant.Thus, the researcher therefore concludes that the null hypotheses stating that "there a significant no relationship between teaching approaches and students' behavior" and "there a significant no relationship between teaching approaches and students' performance are both rejected. Which implies that the alternative hypotheses are accepted which implies that there is a significant relationship between them.Based on the drawn conclusions resulted to the following recommendations: The researcher recommends that the teachers will retain the teaching approaches since is significant contributor to students learning; the teachers may have a standardize rubric in measuring students' performance in athletics events like running, jumping, and throwing; Teachers should create activities that will allow students to apply the newly acquired skills and assess their performance that will help them discover their talents and abilities in athletics events; and collaboration among teachers, Parents, Coaches and other stakeholders to support the physical development of the student.

show abstract

“…The aim is to collaboratively identify and understand the key challenges faced by the urban system concerning environmental, functional-spatial, and socio-economic aspects. This process fosters a shared understanding among all involved parties [30].…”

Section: Multi-risk Governance Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local Governance Support Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Adaptation Strategies: The EU Contribution in the Case Study of the Municipality of Naples

Perney,

D’Angelo

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today’s global context poses ongoing challenges that can be addressed by implementing a systemic and strategic approach directed toward climate-resilient cities. During times of energy and digital transition, managing climate risks involves analysing sector-specific impacts and fostering a shared commitment at the national and international levels; in this sense, European programs promote the dissemination of good practices and implementation of projects and tools to improve the resilience of communities to climate challenges. This paper examines the Naples municipality as a case study within the SEACAP 4 SDG capitalization project in the implementation of innovative governance support tools for hazard and climate adaptation, mitigation, and energy rehabilitation to enhance local governance, planning, and design strategies towards a sustainable and low-emission future. Within the creation of a living lab, tools were selected as part of the project, and training sessions were held targeting key stakeholders. The training aimed to form and inform key players about the tools’ potential, leading to their incorporation into the municipality’s strategic action plan for future implementation. This case study has a high repeatability and stands as a starting point for the implementation of this approach in numerous other local municipalities.

show abstract

Co-production of knowledge for climate-resilient design and planning in Naples, Italy

Cited by 11 publications

References 41 publications

A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities

A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities

Teaching Approaches on Students’ Behavior and Performance in Athletics Events “Input for Students’ Guide”

Local Governance Support Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Adaptation Strategies: The EU Contribution in the Case Study of the Municipality of Naples

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About