2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production of hydrogen and acetaldehyde from ethanol over a highly dispersed Cu catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43 Additionally, the encapsulated catalyst of (Cu/ MFI)@MFI showed higher acetaldehyde productivities than Cu/MFI catalysts based on normalized Cu loadings, confirming the robust activity of encapsulated and unsaturated Cu species (Figure S4). 23 The ethanol conversion and product distribution at 523 K and a WHSV of 0.53 h −1 were analyzed in detail for Cu/MFI catalysts before and after encapsulation. As shown in Figure 4C, the selectivity to acetaldehyde was 68.1% at 98.7% ethanol conversion over the pristine Cu/MFI catalyst, coproducing large amounts of ethylene, ethyl acetate, butyraldehyde, and dioxane (Figure S5) due to the presence of abundant Lewis acid sites on the catalyst (Figure S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…43 Additionally, the encapsulated catalyst of (Cu/ MFI)@MFI showed higher acetaldehyde productivities than Cu/MFI catalysts based on normalized Cu loadings, confirming the robust activity of encapsulated and unsaturated Cu species (Figure S4). 23 The ethanol conversion and product distribution at 523 K and a WHSV of 0.53 h −1 were analyzed in detail for Cu/MFI catalysts before and after encapsulation. As shown in Figure 4C, the selectivity to acetaldehyde was 68.1% at 98.7% ethanol conversion over the pristine Cu/MFI catalyst, coproducing large amounts of ethylene, ethyl acetate, butyraldehyde, and dioxane (Figure S5) due to the presence of abundant Lewis acid sites on the catalyst (Figure S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, copper (Cu)-based catalysts demonstrate unique activity and selectivity in O–H and C–H bond cleavages. Nevertheless, Cu-based catalysts are prone to be deactivated because of particle aggregation, carbon deposition, or catalyst crushing. Under most hydrogen-involved reactions, the leading reason for catalyst deactivation is aggregation of Cu nanoparticles via Ostwald ripening or migration–coalescence processes due to the low Tammann temperature of Cu. To suppress the deactivation of catalysts, some strategies including strong metal and support interactions, alloys and space confinements have been applied to stabilize Cu particles and achieved great successes. For instance, in our previous work, Cu-MFI-AE catalysts were prepared via an ammonia evaporation method, which generated strong interactions between the metal and support. As a result, the catalyst demonstrated distinguished acetaldehyde selectivity and very high catalyst stability in the ethanol dehydrogenation reaction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature-programmed desorption of O 2 and NH 3 from Pt/AC and PtSb 2 /AC catalysts was carried out according to the procedures in the literature, and these experiments are addressed in detail in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a similar study but with high HSV, Liu et al. reported that well-dispersed Cu nanoparticles started agglomerating after 150 h on stream …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol () has been gaining interest because of the co-production of hydrogen and the lower operating temperature range, 200–300°C . The endothermic non-oxidative route is thermodynamically favored only above 600 K, with low-temperature reactions being strongly limited with respect to achievable conversion .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%