1992
DOI: 10.1080/00207549208948156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-ordinated planning for competitive products and their manufacturing operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Eriksen and Berger (1987), Green and Kreiger (1992), and Cook and Gill (1993) consider attribute level-specific costs, they do not recognize the process dependence of these costs, and therefore, do not deal with process selection. Chakravarty and Baum (1992) propose a product line design model that incorporates process selection, and use it to illustrate the interactions among several marketing and manufacturing variables. Unlike the model presented here, however, they do not consider product price to be a decision variable, and they do not model the product selection decision for each customer individually on the basis of surplus maximization.…”
Section: The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Eriksen and Berger (1987), Green and Kreiger (1992), and Cook and Gill (1993) consider attribute level-specific costs, they do not recognize the process dependence of these costs, and therefore, do not deal with process selection. Chakravarty and Baum (1992) propose a product line design model that incorporates process selection, and use it to illustrate the interactions among several marketing and manufacturing variables. Unlike the model presented here, however, they do not consider product price to be a decision variable, and they do not model the product selection decision for each customer individually on the basis of surplus maximization.…”
Section: The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models have been derived for designing the product family instead of a single product to reduce the cost concerns of increased product variety, as Yano and Dobson (1998) reviewed. Chakravarty and Baum (1992) formulate a product family model incorporating process selection and use it to illustrate the interactions with some marketing and manufacturing variables. Saurabh and Krishnan (1999) examine the reduction in complexity of a product family by product design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a competitive product design, knowledge of the trade-off between market share gain and manufacturing cost with respect to attribute bundle and product features is therefore a necessity (Hayes and Wheelwright 1984;Hill 1989;Chakravarty and Ghose 199 1). The nature of such trade-offs is an extremely under-researched area (Johnson 1987;Chakravarty and Baum 1992). To be generalized, relationships between attribute levels and product features; product features and manufacturing steps; and manufacturing steps and manufacturing capacity, inventory, backlogs, and so on must be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%