2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31457-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-optimization of therapeutic antibody affinity and specificity using machine learning models that generalize to novel mutational space

Abstract: Therapeutic antibody development requires selection and engineering of molecules with high affinity and other drug-like biophysical properties. Co-optimization of multiple antibody properties remains a difficult and time-consuming process that impedes drug development. Here we evaluate the use of machine learning to simplify antibody co-optimization for a clinical-stage antibody (emibetuzumab) that displays high levels of both on-target (antigen) and off-target (non-specific) binding. We mutate sites in the an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, for this particular task, using all of the models we consider, UniRep, ESM-1b, AntiBertY and AbLang exhibit performance inferior to one-hot encoding. This is consistent with results reported by Makowski et al, who found that UniRep or physicochemical properties did not improve performance for antibody affinity prediction compared with simple one-hot encoding 58 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Remarkably, for this particular task, using all of the models we consider, UniRep, ESM-1b, AntiBertY and AbLang exhibit performance inferior to one-hot encoding. This is consistent with results reported by Makowski et al, who found that UniRep or physicochemical properties did not improve performance for antibody affinity prediction compared with simple one-hot encoding 58 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As recently reported 24 , 51 , 52 , similar approaches could be applied to fully characterize sequence features of polyreactive conventional antibody clones. These methods can be expanded by analyzing large antigen-naïve libraries and adding in the three light-chain CDRs and germline gene choice as additional factors for polyreactivity prediction and optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A number of recent studies are demonstrating the potential of this field, for example machine learning-guided structural mutagenesis was used to improve the enantioselectivity and thermostability of a hydrolase enzyme used for degrading plastic waste (Lu et al ., 2022). Machine learning has been used in antibody engineering as well, such as predicting therapeutic antibody specificity for developability assessment (Mason et al ., 2021), off-target or polyspecific binding (Makowski et al ., 2022; Saksena et al ., 2022), and predicting escape of viral variants (e.g., SARS-CoV-2) to antibody drug candidates (Taft et al ., 2022). Furthermore, the de novo design of synthetic proteins via generative modeling has leveraged data driven deep learning to outperform physically based design methods on a variety of tasks including improving protein expression, stability, and ligand binding (Dauparas et al ., 2022; Wicky et al ., 2022; Shin et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables the use of supervised machine learning methods, which rely on labeled data for training models. For example, display libraries of antibody variants can be screened for binding and non-binding to target antigen by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) followed by deep sequencing, resulting in labeled data sets for supervised machine learning (Makowski et al ., 2022; Bryant et al ., 2021; Mason et al ., 2021). However, collecting high-quality, large, and well-labeled data sets requires extensive experimental workflows and can represent a bottleneck.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%