2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-operative regulation of ligand binding to melanocortin receptor subtypes: Evidence for interacting binding sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That was also the case in our system, where 5-HT caused concentration dependent binding of [ 35 [26,27], but considerably lower than it could be expected from the radioligand binding (Table 2). Here it would be assumed that the discrepancies found between functional properties of the ligands and their abilities to compete with the radioligand binding can be caused by the kinetics of conformational isomerizations as it has been found for adenosine A 2A receptors [28] or by cooperative regulation of interacting binding sites as it has been found for melanocortin receptors [29] or by peculiarities of signal transduction system [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That was also the case in our system, where 5-HT caused concentration dependent binding of [ 35 [26,27], but considerably lower than it could be expected from the radioligand binding (Table 2). Here it would be assumed that the discrepancies found between functional properties of the ligands and their abilities to compete with the radioligand binding can be caused by the kinetics of conformational isomerizations as it has been found for adenosine A 2A receptors [28] or by cooperative regulation of interacting binding sites as it has been found for melanocortin receptors [29] or by peculiarities of signal transduction system [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3,13 For endogenous peptide α-MSH, the affinities were in the sub-nanomolar range (pK i = 9.3-9.9), whereas synthetic agonist NDP-α-MSH had a slightly higher affinity (pK i = 9.9-10.1), and MS-05 had a lower affinity (pK i = 9.1). 3,13 The pEC 50 values obtained from functional assays were 8 to 8.6 for α-MSH and 7.9 for NDP-α-MSH. 14,15 Functional responses in these studies have been determined using [ and requires the use of radioactively labeled precursors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enabled making the receptor sample and assay environment "cleaner" for the binding studies, so acceptable data of MCR ligand-binding affinities became available. After revealing allosteric interactions between binding sites of MCR, 3 models of tandemly arranged ligandbinding sites 4 and ago-allosteric modulation 5 were proposed. Implementation of a fluorescence anisotropy/intensity assay with a dye-labeled NDP-α-MSH for MC 4 R allowed monitoring of ligand binding in real time 6 and revealed complexities in the binding processes, which have a big impact on the apparent affinities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the most part, the animal stroke models utilized in previous ␣ -MSH and NDP-␣ MSH studies were characterized by brief periods of ischemia, and when histologic assessments were conducted they focused on numbers of viable cells in very discrete brain regions. With particular regard to NDP-␣ MSH, studies of the binding kinetics of 125 I-NDP-␣ MSH to expressed human MCRs have demonstrated a significant fraction of ligand (20-50% of specific bound) remaining firmly bound and dissociating only very slowly or negligibly from MC1R, MC3R and MC4R subtypes [31] . This observation suggests the possibility that NDP-␣ MSH may exhibit enhanced efficacy in vivo by virtue of prolonged occupancy and activation of one or more MCR subtypes, as compared to other MCR ligands or small molecule probes with more traditional complete dissociation from receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%