Background Observational studies have revealed a correlation between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and constipation; however, such findings do not inherently establish causality. Comprehensive and detailed research is essential for ascertaining the direct causal links between these conditions.
Methods In this study, we integrated bidirectional two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) with meta-analysis to investigate the causal relationship between GERD and constipation. Pleiotropy assessments were conducted and the MR-PRESSO technique was applied to outlier data complemented by heterogeneity tests to enhance analytical precision. Leveraging data from various databases, we performed two rounds of MR analysis employing inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger regression, and the weighted median method. The choice between the IVW random effects and fixed effects models was determined by the data heterogeneity. Critical IVW results were further subjected to meta-analysis to validate their reliability and broad applicability. Additionally, a reverse Mendelian randomization analysis was performed. This comprehensive methodology enables detailed examination of the causal link, laying the foundation for future clinical research and intervention strategies.
Results We used the FinnGen R10 and GWAS catalog datasets to explore the causal link between GERD and constipation via MR analysis. Initially, with GERD as the exposure and constipation as the outcome, the FinnGen dataset revealed a positive correlation, as evidenced by an IVW Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.18 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.11-1.26, p=3.15×10-7). Similarly, the GWAS catalog data affirmed a positive association, with an IVW OR of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.33-1.85, p=1.27×10-7). A subsequent meta-analysis corroborated this positive correlation (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.02-1.77, p = 0.035). Moreover, a reverse causation analysis, considering GERD as the outcome and constipation as the exposure, further indicated a positive correlation (OR=1.08, 95% CI=1.03-1.12, p=7.21×10-4).
Conclusion Our study demonstrated that GERD and constipation are mutual risk factors and exhibit a bidirectional causal relationship, with exposure to GERD having a more substantial effect than constipation. These findings provide valuable insights for further studies on the biological mechanisms and clinical treatments.