2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.12.146159
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-occupancy analysis reveals novel transcriptional synergies for axon growth

Abstract: Transcription factors (TFs) act as powerful levers to regulate neural physiology and can be targeted to improve cellular responses to injury or disease. Because TFs often depend on cooperative activity, a major challenge is to identify and deploy optimal sets. Here we developed a novel bioinformatics pipeline, centered on TF co-occupancy of regulatory DNA, and used it to predict factors that improve axon growth in corticospinal tract (CST) axons when combined with a known pro-regenerative TF, Klf6. Assays of n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches to identify growth modulators include screening the efficacy of developmentally regulated genes (Blackmore et al, 2010), phosphatases (Zou et al, 2015), kinases (Buchser et al, 2010), and genome-wide siRNA libraries (Sekine et al, 2018) to stimulate or repress neurite outgrowth in dissociated embryonic neurons in vitro. Additional approaches use transcriptional profiling of CNS neurons harvested in vivo during postnatal development (Wang et al, 2007;Moore et al, 2009;Venkatesh et al, 2018Venkatesh et al, , 2021, or during injury-induced axon growth (Fink et al, 2017;Tran et al, 2019;Lindborg et al, 2021). Together, these approaches have identified Klf6, Nr5a2, sac2, Lppr1 and Rab27b, Myl10, Airn, Prg2, and Il-22, which stimulate axon growth in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to identify growth modulators include screening the efficacy of developmentally regulated genes (Blackmore et al, 2010), phosphatases (Zou et al, 2015), kinases (Buchser et al, 2010), and genome-wide siRNA libraries (Sekine et al, 2018) to stimulate or repress neurite outgrowth in dissociated embryonic neurons in vitro. Additional approaches use transcriptional profiling of CNS neurons harvested in vivo during postnatal development (Wang et al, 2007;Moore et al, 2009;Venkatesh et al, 2018Venkatesh et al, , 2021, or during injury-induced axon growth (Fink et al, 2017;Tran et al, 2019;Lindborg et al, 2021). Together, these approaches have identified Klf6, Nr5a2, sac2, Lppr1 and Rab27b, Myl10, Airn, Prg2, and Il-22, which stimulate axon growth in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages of in vitro screens include the embryonic age of the neurons and the simplicity of the in vitro growth environment, both of which poorly reflect the adult CNS. To overcome these challenges, two in vivo approaches have emerged to identify novel cell autonomous axon growth activators: identifying factors that drive the postdevelopmental growth of CNS neurons (Venkatesh et al, 2018;Venkatesh et al, 2021), and factors that support plasticity of intact CNS neurons after partial SCI (Fink et al, 2017). Recently we exploited the latter approach and profiled intact adult corticospinal tract neurons (CSNs) undergoing functional plasticity after unilateral corticospinal tract (CST) lesion (unilateral pyramidotomy, uPyX).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%