“…Since this compilation, the number of species and higher taxa targeted by telomere studies experienced a manifold increase. New data became available for many previously poorly studied or unexplored orders such as Odonata (Kuznetsova et al, ), Orthoptera (Buleu, Jetybayev, Chobanov, & Bugrov, ; Kociński, Grzywacz, Chobanov, & Warchałowska‐Śliwa, ), Phasmatodea (Liehr, Buleu, Karamysheva, Bugrov, & Rubtsov, ; Scali et al, ), Mantophasmatodea (Lachowska‐Cierlik, Maryańska‐Nadachowska, Kuznetsova, & Picker, ), Hemiptera (Anjos, Rocha, Paladini, Mariguela, & Cabral‐de‐Mello, ; Chirino et al, ; Grozeva, Kuznetsova, & Anokhin, ; Kuznetsova, Grozeva, Hartung, & Anokhin, ; Luan, Sun, Fei, & Douglas, ; Mandrioli, Zanasi, & Manicardi, ; Maryańska‐Nadachowska, Kuznetsova, Golub, & Anokhin, ; Mohan, Rani, Kulashreshta, & Kadandale, ), Neuroptera (Kuznetsova, Khabiev, & Anokhin, ), Coleoptera (Mravinac et al, ), Hymenoptera (Gokhman et al, ; Gokhman & Kuznetsova, ; Menezes et al, ) and others (see Figure , Appendix ). All this information was mainly obtained by FISH and is therefore more reliable if compared with SBH, because, when (TTAGG) n sequences are detected by the latter technique, they are not necessarily telomeric, as the specific probe could also hybridize with repetitive sequences located at non‐telomeric sites (Meyne et al, ; Sahara et al, ).…”