2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000165110.78397.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-infection of Polyomavirus-BK and Cytomegalovirus in Renal Transplant Recipients

Abstract: In conclusion, high plasma BK-positivity (>10) is significantly associated with BK nephropathy. Plasma BK-positivity is highly associated with co-infection of CMV, suggesting possible risk factors for one another. Therefore, detection of either infection strongly suggests the need to monitor for the other. This strategy may lead to the prevention of virus-induced complications by preemptive antiviral therapy in renal allografts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All AEs were recorded and graded, in terms of relationship to study treatment and severity, as mild (does not interfere with patient's usual function), moderate (interferes to some extent with patient's usual function), or severe (interferes significantly with patient's usual function). Laboratory safety evaluations, including assessment of blood Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels (average value from 2 separate assays expressed as copies/500 mg of DNA) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction of total DNA, as previously described (19), and vital-sign assessments were carried out at screening (14-28 days prior to baseline), baseline, weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6, and at the 2 followup visits (weeks 8 and 12). Electrocardiograms were obtained at screening and at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All AEs were recorded and graded, in terms of relationship to study treatment and severity, as mild (does not interfere with patient's usual function), moderate (interferes to some extent with patient's usual function), or severe (interferes significantly with patient's usual function). Laboratory safety evaluations, including assessment of blood Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels (average value from 2 separate assays expressed as copies/500 mg of DNA) by quantitative polymerase chain reaction of total DNA, as previously described (19), and vital-sign assessments were carried out at screening (14-28 days prior to baseline), baseline, weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6, and at the 2 followup visits (weeks 8 and 12). Electrocardiograms were obtained at screening and at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…donor CMV seropositive and recipient CMV seronegative. While co-infection of polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus have been reported in renal transplant recipients [28,29] and after stem cell transplantation [30], the impact of recipient CMV seropositivity without evidence of CMV viremia on polyomavirus infection is unknown. However, in a study of 132 hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients a positive recipient CMV serostatus and the underlying disease emerged as the only risk factors associated with BK viremia [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Diastolic function may be preserved on echocardiography despite restrictive physiology and it does not appear to be a reliable surrogate for echocardiographic diagnosis of IOC. Two patients with the dilated phenotype and HFrEF had only partial reversal of their LV dysfunction with institution of iron chelation therapy.…”
Section: Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, we have devised a robust transcriptomic analysis to identify genes upregulated in relapsed patients and drug-resistant AML cell lines and linearly associated with patient survival in multivariable analysis. We have found that (1) the expression of Vanin 1 (VNN1), an anti-apoptotic enzyme inhibiting caspases and scavenging reactive oxygen species, 3 is significantly associated with relapse-, event-, or disease-free survival Figure S1). The resulting 6 differentially-regulated genes (DRGs, SPINK2, TM4SF1, VNN1, SYTL4, BEX1, TEAD4) were then inputted into a Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) model of patients' disease-free survival (DFS) that also included age, gender, karyotypical abnormalities, French-AmericanBritish (FAB) subgroups and major driver mutations (Supporting Information Table S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%