2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO-free hydrogen production over Au/CeO2–Fe2O3 catalysts: Part 1. Impact of the support composition on the performance for the preferential CO oxidation reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising since the expected oxidation state of Fe 3+ also should enhance oxygen vacancy formation according to Equation (3), assuming that Fe 3+ (crystal radius VIII = 0.092 nm [16]) substitutes for Ce 4+ (crystal radius VIII = 0.111 nm [16]). Although the mismatch is ~17%, which is slightly higher than that suggested for extensive solid solubility (15%) [17], the formation of CeyFe1−yO2−x solid solution has been reported previously [33,34]. However, the substitution of Ce 3+ by Fe 3+ is much less likely owing to the large size of the former (crystal radius VIII = 0.1283 nm [16]) and the associated ~28% mismatch.…”
Section: Water Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This is not surprising since the expected oxidation state of Fe 3+ also should enhance oxygen vacancy formation according to Equation (3), assuming that Fe 3+ (crystal radius VIII = 0.092 nm [16]) substitutes for Ce 4+ (crystal radius VIII = 0.111 nm [16]). Although the mismatch is ~17%, which is slightly higher than that suggested for extensive solid solubility (15%) [17], the formation of CeyFe1−yO2−x solid solution has been reported previously [33,34]. However, the substitution of Ce 3+ by Fe 3+ is much less likely owing to the large size of the former (crystal radius VIII = 0.1283 nm [16]) and the associated ~28% mismatch.…”
Section: Water Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Several catalytic systems have been reported for use in the PROX reaction; they can be classified into three groups [11]: i) Pt, Ru and Rh supported catalysts [12,13]; ii) gold supported catalysts [14,15] iii) and copper-cerium oxide based catalysts. The last group has been thoroughly studied [8,16,17] and is well-known for presenting considerably higher selectivity to CO oxidation than the Pt-based catalysts at comparable conversion levels.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last group has been thoroughly studied [8,16,17] and is well-known for presenting considerably higher selectivity to CO oxidation than the Pt-based catalysts at comparable conversion levels. As regards the gold supported catalysts, they are very active, especially at low temperature which is one of the challenges to be overcome when designing PROX catalysts [14,15]. Combining copper and gold on several catalytic supports has been considered in some recent studies [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deposited platinum systems an additional factor is the nature and redox state of the support. Recently, much attention has been paid to the Pt/CeO 2 systems, since the redox ability of ceria makes them efficient catalysts of various industrial processes, such as preferential CO oxidation, 11,12 water gas shift reaction, 13 conversion of automotive exhaust gases into harmless ones, 14,15 reforming of alcohols, 16 conversions in fuel cell catalysts, 17 etc. The catalytic role of ceria is commonly considered to be related to its reducibility at elevated temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%