2019
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-expression Network Analysis Identifies Four Hub Genes Associated With Prognosis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Abstract: Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are heterogeneous tumors derived from mesenchymal cells that differentiate into soft tissues. The prognosis of patients who present with an STS is influenced by the regulation of a complex gene network.Methods: Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify gene modules associated with STS (Samples = 156).Results: Among the 11 modules identified, the black and blue modules were highly correlated with STS. However, using preservation analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploitation of the function of dysregulated lncRNAs will provide potential clinical applications for TN's diagnosis and treatment. WGCNA can be used to identify key lncRNAs associated with multiple cancer pathogenesis and progression [23][24][25][26]. Survival analysis verified the identified lncRNAs possessing potential indicative roles in TN prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Exploitation of the function of dysregulated lncRNAs will provide potential clinical applications for TN's diagnosis and treatment. WGCNA can be used to identify key lncRNAs associated with multiple cancer pathogenesis and progression [23][24][25][26]. Survival analysis verified the identified lncRNAs possessing potential indicative roles in TN prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, to further understand the relationship between hub genes and plaque vulnerability, we downloaded GSE60993 and used it as the training dataset. Then, we compared the expression differences of hub genes among different groups and showed the results in the ggplot2 package [17] in R. Subsequently, the "survival" package [18] in R was used to perform overall survival (heart failure) and disease-free survival analyses for all hub genes. Patients were divided into four groups (high vs. low) based on the hub gene expression level in comparison to the mean expression level of that hub gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From that, Benjamini and Hochberg's false discovery rate (FDR) may be a better choice. Likewise, many previous works [49][50][51][52][53] related the expression levels of each identified driver gene to prognostic value (e.g., the overall survival of patients), and the genes when P-value ≤ 0.05 (Log-rank test) were considered to define significant association. Again, FDR control is crucial, so we developed the tool 'geneSA' (https ://githu b.com/huyng uyen2 50896 /geneS A) to automatically do the above task and only preserve the genes if Q-value ≤ 0.05 (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR).…”
Section: List Of Improvements Proposed In the Work Selection Of Drivmentioning
confidence: 99%