Co-emergence and Collapse: The Mesoscopic Approach for Conceptualizing and Investigating the Functional Integration of Organisms

Abstract

The fall of reductionist approaches to explanation leaves biology with an unescapable challenge: how to decipher complex systems. This entails a number of very critical questions, the most basic ones being: “What do we mean by ‘complex’?” and “What is the system we should look for?” In complex systems, constraints belong to a higher level that the molecular one and their effect reduces and constrains the manifold of the accessible internal states of the system itself. Function is related but not deterministically imposed by the underlying structure. It is quite unlikely that such kind of complexity could be grasped by current approaches focusing on a single organization scale. The natural co-emergence of systems, parts and properties can be adopted as a hypothesis-free conceptual framework to understand functional integration of organisms, including their hierarchical or multilevel patterns, and including the way scientific practice proceeds in approaching such complexity. External, “driving” factors – order parameters and control parameters provided by the surrounding microenvironment – are always required to “push” the components’ fate into well-defined developmental directions. In the negative, we see that in pathological processes such as cancer, organizational fluidity, collapse of levels and dynamic heterogeneity make it hard to even find a level of observation for a stable explanandum to persist in scientific practice. Parts and the system both lose their properties once the system is destabilized. The mesoscopic approach is our proposal to conceptualizing, investigating and explaining in biology. “Mesoscopic way of thinking” is increasingly popular in the epistemology of biology and corresponds to looking for an explanation (and possibly a prediction) where “non-trivial determinism is maximal”: the “most microscopic” level of organization is not necessarily the place where “the most relevant facts do happen.” A fundamental re-thinking of the concept of causality is also due for order parameters to be carefully and correctly identified. In the biological realm, entities have relational properties only, as they depend ontologically on the context they happen to be in. The basic idea of a relational ontology is that, in our inventory of the world, relations are somehow prior to the relata (i.e., entities).

Network Physiology of Exercise: Beyond Molecular and Omics Perspectives

“…Life is a property emerging from the interaction of cell components and cannot be explained either by any single component or by their simple aggregation because in biology, "more is different" [18], and relations are as important as entities [19]. Similarly, macroscopic physiological states and functions emerge from the interaction among diverse structures and processes operating at different spatiotemporal scales (from the subcellular level to the entire organism).…”

Small-Sided Games as Holons in the Football: a hierarchical systems approach

“…Therefore, keep away from thermodynamic equilibrium appears to be an essential feature for the teams can reorganize (adapt) to achieve their goals. It has been proposed that to remain far from equilibrium, a system needs successive exchange between its components at an immediately lower level 7 , which implies considering a hierarchical structure of open systems 8,9 .…”

“…Therefore, there is a balance between autonomy and constraint at all levels of the hierarchy. The hierarchical levels are established in vertical (asymmetry between levels) and horizontal structures (symmetry between the subsystems characterizing the level variety), through a descending causation in which the whole restricts the parts, but does not control them 8,9 .…”

Multi-scopic neuro-cognitive adaptation for legged locomotion robots

“…Finally, mesoscopic systems integrate microscopic and macroscopic phenomena 20 , with behavior provision—including speed and movement direction—defined at the mesoscopic scale in this case. This mesoscopic approach can also conceptualize an organism’s functionality 21 . Although integrating embodiment and environment, as defined at an ecological scale, could provide an alternative strategy for decreasing the complexity of assimilating robot behavior and environmental properties, realizing such a project remains a challenge.…”