2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in a wastewater treatment plant based on mainstream anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology: A techno-economic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disposal of the dewatered sludge was the main cost factor, representing 57 and 64% of the overall costs for BMP and full-scale data, respectively. Similar observations were made by Vinardell et al (2021) who conducted a techno-economic evaluation of the co-digestion of FW and SS after implementing an anaerobic membrane bioreactor in the mainstream of a WWTP. The co-digestion of BW and GTS generated a surplus of thermal energy which could be further utilized to dry the dewatered sludge.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The disposal of the dewatered sludge was the main cost factor, representing 57 and 64% of the overall costs for BMP and full-scale data, respectively. Similar observations were made by Vinardell et al (2021) who conducted a techno-economic evaluation of the co-digestion of FW and SS after implementing an anaerobic membrane bioreactor in the mainstream of a WWTP. The co-digestion of BW and GTS generated a surplus of thermal energy which could be further utilized to dry the dewatered sludge.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…LCA studies that assessed the environmental impacts of pyrolysis ,− and gasification of solid digestate from municipal sewage sludge were investigated in China, Italy, and Morocco that applied CML, ReCiPe, and IPCC. These methods were used to assess the environmental impacts of recovering nutrients from solid digestates of wet feedstocks through composting and from their liquid digestates via struvite precipitation , and sequencing batch reactors , in USA, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Iran. Studies in Germany and China compared the environmental impacts between composting, hydrothermal carbonization, , and gasification of organic municipal solid waste and its solid digestate using different LCA methods.…”
Section: Applications Of Data Science In Rrcc From Organic Waste Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, microalgae-based wastewater remediation is a process of fixing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and releasing oxygen (O 2 ), while traditional wastewater treatment technologies, including aerobic digestion and anaerobic fermentation, produce a large amount of greenhouse gases (CO 2 and CH 4 ). 5,6 Owing to the aforementioned advantages, in recent years microalgaebased wastewater remediation has emerged into the limelight. 7 Traditional methods of harvesting microalgae mainly include centrifugation, filtration, gravity-driven sedimentation and flocculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence microalgae‐based wastewater remediation can be regarded as a value‐added biotechnology for sustainable development. Second, microalgae‐based wastewater remediation is a process of fixing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and releasing oxygen (O 2 ), while traditional wastewater treatment technologies, including aerobic digestion and anaerobic fermentation, produce a large amount of greenhouse gases (CO 2 and CH 4 ) 5,6 . Owing to the aforementioned advantages, in recent years microalgae‐based wastewater remediation has emerged into the limelight 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%