2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-development of internalizing and externalizing behavior problems during early childhood among child welfare-involved children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the study relied on a community sample of teen mothers and their children in a northwest region of the United States. However, the general developmental trend of broadband ratings of internalizing and externalizing problems in our study sample is similar to those in other general community samples of children, with internalizing problems showing an increasing trend (Davis et al, 2015;Flouri et al, 2017;Olson et al, 2017) and externalizing problems showing a decreasing trend (Fanti & Henrich, 2010;Flouri et al, 2017), including high-risk samples, such as welfare system-involved children (Mowbray et al, 2018;Yoon et al, 2017), easing the concern of generalization to some degree. Nevertheless, given the specificity of our sample, generalization of the current study findings to the general population should be done cautiously.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…First, the study relied on a community sample of teen mothers and their children in a northwest region of the United States. However, the general developmental trend of broadband ratings of internalizing and externalizing problems in our study sample is similar to those in other general community samples of children, with internalizing problems showing an increasing trend (Davis et al, 2015;Flouri et al, 2017;Olson et al, 2017) and externalizing problems showing a decreasing trend (Fanti & Henrich, 2010;Flouri et al, 2017), including high-risk samples, such as welfare system-involved children (Mowbray et al, 2018;Yoon et al, 2017), easing the concern of generalization to some degree. Nevertheless, given the specificity of our sample, generalization of the current study findings to the general population should be done cautiously.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Given that exposure to ACEs is prevalent among young children and creates a toxic environment where children experience overwhelming stress that hinders healthy brain, cognitive, social, and emotional development [10], more research is warranted to examine the immediate effects of ACEs during childhood. Furthermore, while ample research has examined the effects of child maltreatment (i.e., maltreatment ACEs) on early childhood development [11][12][13], less attention has been paid to NM-ACEs and home environment, such as parental mental health problems, substance use, and household poverty. Several studies have examined the role of home environment, including chaotic homes, on child development and suggested that household chaos (independently or in conjunction with child maltreatment) may contribute to negative developmental outcomes, such as child disruptive behavior [14,15].…”
Section: Adverse Childhood Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…behavioural problems are mostly reported for children who experienced physical abuse [11] whilst emotional di culties are mostly identi ed among children who suffer psychological abuse or neglect [12]. However, Yoon et al [13] indicated that externalizing problems are consistently identi ed among maltreated boys whilst abused girls largely present internalizing di culties. Beside parental personality types, attitudes, perceptions, practices and values, parental illness and death might also create risks for children to be abused and exploited [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%