2022
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsac155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-designing marine science beyond good intentions: support stakeholders’ empowerment in transformative pathways

Abstract: Calls for science to innovate by including stakeholders' in the creation of marine knowledge have been rising, to create impact beyond laboratories and to contribute to the empowerment of local communities when interacting with marine and coastal ecosystems. As a transdisciplinary group of scientists working on co-designing research projects, this paper draws upon our experiences to further define the concept and seek to improve the process of co-design. We highlight the key barriers for co-design processes to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actions taken to shift social-ecological systems through transformation towards more sustainable trajectories can have negative social impacts and exclude people from decisionmaking processes (Bennett et al, 2019). Co-creating knowledge with fishers requires understanding the governance structures for fishers, considering power asymmetries in the governance and management of the ocean (Caze et al, 2022), and the economic domination that some fishers undergo (Clouette, 2021). The literature on transformation research calls for a greater integration of politics and power, by considering the decision-making process behind the measures leading to the transformations of the system and of the practices, and by tracking winners and losers in the transformations, with the aim for societal justice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actions taken to shift social-ecological systems through transformation towards more sustainable trajectories can have negative social impacts and exclude people from decisionmaking processes (Bennett et al, 2019). Co-creating knowledge with fishers requires understanding the governance structures for fishers, considering power asymmetries in the governance and management of the ocean (Caze et al, 2022), and the economic domination that some fishers undergo (Clouette, 2021). The literature on transformation research calls for a greater integration of politics and power, by considering the decision-making process behind the measures leading to the transformations of the system and of the practices, and by tracking winners and losers in the transformations, with the aim for societal justice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, decision-makers formulate policies according to their understanding of the world, which is defined by the political use of scientific expertise (Latour, 2018), but also by their experiential knowledge and world views. Knowledge production on bycatch emerges as a key step to the management of an issue that remains the subject of uncertainties, hence participating in knowledge production through the academic system could theoretically be a lever for empowering stakeholders to take an active role in shaping the policies for sustainability (Caze et al, 2022). Power is linked to deliberation, learning (and who defines what type of learning), the choice of indicators for measuring outcomes, and the sharing of risk (Lascoumes, 1994;Armitage et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods range from varied forms of participatory research, through knowledge co-production, to transdisciplinary (TD) research. Each term represents increasing levels of stakeholder engagement in the research process, moving from participatory research, where stakeholders may contribute insights or feedback (Mackinson et al, 2011;Avilés Irahola et al, 2022), to knowledge co-production (Norström et al, 2020;Cazé et al, 2022;Jidda-Fada and Bennett, 2022), which entails a more equal partnership between researchers and stakeholders, and is culminating in transdisciplinary research. This most integrated form not only bridges academic disciplines, but also deeply involves all stakeholders in the research process from conception to execution (Steger et al, 2021;Franke et al, 2022;Klein, 2022;Archibald et al, 2023;Reed et al, 2023;Descalzi et al, 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-design of research is a key aspect of transformative ocean science, as it promotes collaboration and integration among different stakeholder groups, and is essential for developing a comprehensive understanding of the ocean and finding solutions (IOC-UNESCO, 2021; Cazé et al, 2022). Co-design of research here refers to the process of jointly designing a research project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%